Today many countries import food from different parts of the world. Is this a positive or negative development?
Thanks to globalization, export and import have hitherto been gaining ground between numerous nations in the world. In my judgment, this action is a positive development as trading food universally is beneficial in terms of the diversity of food amongst countries and the reduction of the unemployment rate.
First and foremost, the deciding factor that positively influences importing food is that people are able to share divergent kinds of food which can be grown in their countries but not in others. To exemplify, rice which is an indisputable food in a meal of every Asian country can now be exported to the West where it is impossible to raise this plantation due to the lack of cultivated land and suitable tropical climate weather. Hence, trading rice from Asia to Europe or America certainly put Western people in a position to absorb the nutrients that rice carries. In addition to the cultural share between nations, there are a few more advantages that are resulted from food exportation.
Contrary to popular beliefs, exchanging food across countries and cultures might make a decisive contribution to declining the number of people who are unemployed in both exporting and importing countries. This is because there will be more job opportunities for miserable people such as goods conveyors, truck and container drivers. Particularly, they are permitted to provide transport services from the harbor to retailers, which undoubtedly saves them from wandering around and begging strangers for money on the street or even committing unlawful activities. The eventual outcome can be lucrative for the population and the economic growth of both exporters and importers.
On balance, even though prices of food sold overseas can be marginally more expensive than the domestic one, cultural exchange and unemployment rates in both developed and developing countries will undeniably be refined considerably through trading food abroad. Personally, I believe that the public should be given an incentive to export and import foodstuffs across various nations not merely to widen their horizons regarding foreign languages but also to enhance their quality of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-01 | linh allie | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-25 | Mollymaul | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-07 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2024-09-09 | RkmsU | 61 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- Around the world many adults are working from home and more children are beginning to study from home because technology has become cheaper and more accessible Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- Some people believe that the best way to encourage children that have a healthy diet at school and some people believe that parents should teach them to have a healthy diet Discuss both views and give your opinion 76
- Gender equality has not been achieved in our society Women still do not have the same rights and opportunities as men To what extend do you agree or disagree 79
- Today many countries import food from different parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in newspapers What factors do you think influence these decisions Do we become used to bad news and would it be better if more good news was reported 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 506, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (Western) must be used with a third-person verb: 'peoples'.
Suggestion: peoples
...Europe or America certainly put Western people in a position to absorb the nutrients t...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, regarding, so, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1844.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40762463343 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.900416307 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595307917889 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 51.5382139776 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.666666667 106.682146367 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253841625849 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905855572453 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0615420208098 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164324178516 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060209961736 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.