tax on ciggaret is fair
The reading states that imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy food will benefit society and will lead to healthy behaviour and provides three reasons for support. However, the professor explains that it would not lead to a healthy society necessarily and refutes each of author's reason.
First, the reading states that the taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food will lead to discouraging people from smoking and eating these foods. The professor refutes this point, and explain that the high taxes on cigarettes would force a smoker to buy cheaper cigarettes as we know these cigarettes have more dangerous material in comparison to high-quality cigarettes, so it makes them more endangered.
Second, the reading claims that these taxes are fair because people with healthy behaviour should not cover the medical costs. However, the professor refutes this point and says that imposing high taxes on cigarettes and unhealthy food is not fair at all because people with high income and low income pay the same amount of their payment for this behavior it is not fair at all.
Third, the reading states that taxes like these will provide a financial source for government and all society would benefit from this. The professor refutes this point and says that it is possible that the government used to these resources and would not tend to lose these taxes consequently do not prevent people from smoking in public place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-10 | madgal | 71 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | Hoseingitinejad | 73 | view |
| 2019-01-22 | Hoseingitinejad | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and refutes each of authors reason. First, the reading states that the taxes...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, so it makes them more endangered. Second, the reading claims that these ta...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...this behavior it is not fair at all. Third, the reading states that taxes lik...
^^^^
Line 6, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt people from smoking in public place.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 5.04856512141 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 12.0772626932 75% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 30.3222958057 76% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1211.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 236.0 270.72406181 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1313559322 5.08290768461 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44929549169 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 145.348785872 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.46186440678 0.540411800872 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 366.3 419.366225166 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 2.5761589404 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.2025801565 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.375 110.228320801 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 21.698381199 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06452816374 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.27373068433 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16815596515 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868377340999 0.0996497079465 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0577171468448 0.0662205650399 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108726993568 0.162205337803 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0659331278302 0.0443174109184 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.8541721854 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.0289183223 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.55 8.42419426049 90% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 63.6247240618 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.7273730684 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.2008830022 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.