Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
Rules and laws have many implications on citizens’ lifestyle in a discernible way. As the proposal that individuals could do anything based on their personal preferences could hamper the social functioning is legitimate, I totally agree with this view.
On the one hand, there are many problems associated with the functioning of society without rules and laws. First, individuals especially those from the young generation could not distinguish what is right or wrong without the teaching of rules, thereby breeding the future offender for some serious crimes. Second, without the existence of regulations and law enforcements from the official authorities, individuals would commit crimes with impunity irrespective of misdemeanors or felonies, acting as a deterrent for the country’s development. For example, Official authorities could freely get implicated in embezzlement and money laundering from the national budgets and not encounter any punishments, possibly culminating in the political, economic and social turmoil in the country.
On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that the legislation could guarantee the stability of society. Specifically, regulations could act as an incentive for the decline in crime commissions as perpetrators could take the harsh punishments into consideration. For instance, Vietnamese individuals would be discouraged from ownership of illegally smuggled weapons due to the life imprisonment imposed on people with weapon accessibility, suggesting a causal relationship with the plummet in homicide cases, ensuring the social soundness.
In conclusion, Individuals’ freedom to do anything based on their personal preferences could be instrumental in the downturn of society. Official authorities should undertake some practical initiatives to ascertain the law abidingness in citizens for the long-term sustainability of society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-19 | Gulnoza11 | 84 | view |
| 2021-06-19 | rahulgumber | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | kiransandhu706@gmail.com | 76 | view |
| 2021-02-01 | xuanhieu26 | 56 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | kiransandhu706@gmail.com | 61 | view |
- The percentage of female members or parliaments in European countries 2000 2012 100
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people say the gap between rich and poor people is wider as rich people become richer and poor people grow poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address those problems 84
- In many countries, people now wear Western clothes (suits, jeans) rather than traditional clothing. Why? Is this a positive or negative development? 56
- The number of people working online from home has grown in some countries What advantages and disadvantages can come of this trend 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 67, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a discernible way" with adverb for "discernible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...mplications on citizens' lifestyle in a discernible way. As the proposal that individuals could...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05925925926 5.12529762239 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45552975259 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 510.3 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1823069384 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.727272727 106.682146367 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5454545455 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.45454545455 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18731543802 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757131405334 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745870022343 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123700024315 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0610386226271 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 14.6 7.44779559118 196% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.16 12.4159519038 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.97 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.