Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss
In recent years, companies are adopting innovative and smarter approaches to handle the business decisions and replacing the traditional ones. As we know employees are the backbone of any organization and upper management can certainly benefit from their involvement in the decision making. In my opinion, inclusion of low-key staff must be leveraged for many in-house verdicts and this essay will offer many reasons for this viewpoint.
To commence with, employees can bring fresh perspective and creative ideas for the growth of the company. For instance, many start-ups and small scale companies pay special attention to the staff’s voice before making any big decision which in turn boosts employees’ bonding with the organization and such decisions are often win-win situation for employees as well as the company.
On the other hand, company’s sensitive information should not be shared with employees such as the losses incurred in the last quarter, merger or acquisitions news as employees can get nervous and spread rumors or even tarnish the company’s image in the market.
In a nutshell, there is no shadow of doubt that top management should take the inputs from employees into consideration and reap many benefits. That being said, it is imperative to carefully inspect the information before sharing it with the low level staff.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-18 | minhaz | 77 | view |
| 2019-04-04 | Trish_25 | 72 | view |
| 2019-03-06 | Samuelparera | 77 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | RAVI.SHANKAR | 77 | view |
| 2018-07-30 | SB83 | 80 | view |
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 33
- •What roles should governments, companies & individuals play to combat climate change? 88
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 80
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters. Do u support it or not? (Agree/Disagree) 80
- Many people believe that social networking sites have had had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, well, as for, for instance, such as, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 20.9802955665 43% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1159.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44131455399 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96966820113 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638497652582 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 349.2 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6551724138 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.6587194429 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.875 104.977214359 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.625 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.625 7.25397266985 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280729320435 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103524621655 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734237846418 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157052653109 0.151781067708 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496158017618 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.5310837438 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.