It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people hold the perspective that it is impossible for goverments to make tertiary education accessible to a large number of youngsters and there is also no use doing so. Personally, I completely agree with this statement.
First of all, national and local authorities are highly unlikely to be able to supply more university places for the young generation due to many financial constraints. Admittedly, it would require a great deal of money poured into building new bricks and mortar as well as supplying teaching equipment. In addtion, a lot of professors would be consequently on demand, which would lead to another issue of salaries paid to those people. All things mentioned above would definetely be a real burden to the government budget, especially during times of economic crisis like today, when the state has to prioritize their expenditure on subsidizing domestic enterprises, stablilizing the economy and paying unemployment benefits.
Secondly, if people gained access to higher education so easily, they would tend to overlook the merits of vocational education, which might result in a lot of trouble. Obviously, should the doors to a university or a college be more open, with cheaper tuition fees or easier entrance exams for instance, there would be a high probability that people would prefer to attend some university rather than enroll in a vocational course. As a result, there would exist an imbalance in the world of work with the number of white-collar workers overwhelming that of blue-collar workers. From another angle, the unemployed rate among university and college graduates would be on the increase while there would be a lack of skilled labour.
In conclusion, I once again reaffirm my view that providing a large percentage of the young with university places is neither feasible nor useful.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Thao Phan Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
- Cycling is more environmentally-friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can its popularity be increased? 89
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- In many countries, governments are spending a large amount of money on improving Internet access. Why is it important and do you think it is the most appropriate use of government money? 89
- Some people believe famous people’s support towards international aid organizations draws attention to problems. Other thinks celebrities make the problems less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- New technologies have change the way children spend their free time. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...o make tertiary education accessible to a large number of youngsters and there is also no use doi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 381, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d be consequently on demand, which would lead to another issue of salaries paid t...
^^
Line 5, column 76, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o higher education so easily, they would tend to overlook the merits of vocationa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, if, look, second, secondly, so, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25423728814 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94951098543 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637288135593 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.8743455851 49.4020404114 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.909090909 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.1818181818 7.06120827912 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158857742416 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601455120346 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668701820678 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112687297562 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479434893685 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.