. Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that consultations through video chats with doctors is beneficial or worst for patient to cure the disease. In this essay, I shall highlights some pros and cons of this argument before deducing any result. I, personally believe that it’s disadvantages triumph over it’s advantages.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument of argument associated with the fact that video communication is the effective way to discuss some serious issues with consultants. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that some major concerned and rare illnesses need expert opinion from any where in the world, in that case the only possible option is to contact with consultant, who is not present at that situation. As a prime example, in emergency situations cure of some serious cancers have been practicing through online video chats with doctors, not available at that time and right decision at that time have proved the effectiveness of this technique.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that decision making on live video calls is not always beneficial for the patient. Therefore, personal dealing with the patients in case of emergency procedures is more life saving than to rely on decisions off expert on video chats. Moreover, face to face counceling is the most effective way to deal with patient and to convey your planes in appropriate way to patient and attendants.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that it is better to choose right option at right time and decision make capabilities of consultants present in that situation offers variety of option to cure patient. Thus, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-07-05 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-04-18 | zjaved | 80 | view |
| 2019-02-04 | Ahmed145 | 85 | view |
- In academic studies, grouping students according to academic abilities is good or not good? Give your opinion 85
- The belching and unauthorized behaviour is unacceptable in modern offices How far you support this view Give your response with justification 91
- Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport? 77
- Personal Development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- Certain kinds of music promote learning in their life. Do you agree or disagree?. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 33, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of argument'.
Suggestion: of argument
...es. At the outset, there are myriad of argument of argument associated with the fact that video com...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: ANY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anywhere'?
Suggestion: anywhere
...rare illnesses need expert opinion from any where in the world, in that case the only pos...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 532, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous cancers have been practicing through online video chats with doctors, not ava...
^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to right'
Suggestion: to right
...n propounds that it is better to choose right option at right time and decision make ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 31.9359605911 166% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1525.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22260273973 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80009474614 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558219178082 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.8730061004 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.636363636 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5454545455 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236834509068 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825104041884 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052566854953 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13489040358 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563064662679 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.