As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or experience to support.
In this day and age, building better public transport networks over roads have become a debatable issue among people from all walks of life all around the world. Although building public mode of transport rather than roads are regarded as thoroughly both positive and constructive by many individuals, a number of people hold an opposite view. I am inclined to strongly believe that governments should focus more on building public transport systems.
To begin with, there are a number of reasons why I support the idea that governments should concentrate more on building public transport. First and foremost is that public transport systems are always economic for the common people. Secondly, it causes less pollution and is more environment-friendly. For instance, 20 people traveling on a bus is always efficient compared to 20 people driving their own vehicles. Consequently, it is quite conspicuous that public mode of transport is quite advantageous.
However, there is no doubt that the lack of roads can cause various negative outcomes. Roads are necessary and important for a nation’s development. But the real question is about the priority. By way of example, a recent study conducted by eminent scientists has shown that 80% of the people prefer public transports over private vehicles. Thus, it is quite obvious that governments should be focusing on building a better network of public transport.
To put it in a nutshell, while there are several persuasive arguments on both sides, my opinion depicts that the governments should give more attention in building better public transport facilities over roads because it’ll benefit the nations in the long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2023-01-12 | Yuli | 77 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 85 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 55 | view |
| 2022-11-04 | fereshteh.r | 88 | view |
- As cities expanding, some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What’s your opinion? Give some examples or exp 77
- Nowadays people believe that the environment influences their accomplishments Some people think their success and accomplishment were influenced by the places where they grew up Do you think the environment does or does not affect people s accomplishment 80
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
- The information revolution by modern mass communication has both positive and negative consequences for individuals and for society To what extent do you agree Explain with your own experience 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, thus, while, for instance, no doubt, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35205992509 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98437250699 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569288389513 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6976849116 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339124523983 0.242375264174 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111178783409 0.0925447433944 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632616482128 0.071462118173 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210405146145 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127097287296 0.0609392437508 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.