Mass communication
Technology has massively changed the way we live communicate, mass communication now consists of calls, texts and video chats. In this essay, I will explore the positive and negatives information technology has had on mass communication.
Decades ago the only form of communication was letters, telegraphs, faxes and voice calls. Today with cellphones and the internet being affordable to the mass population, people are able to connect and communicate more frequently and more often. People can call and video chat, from anywhere across the globe at any time.
This allows families who live large distances from one another to stay in touch more often and see their family via video calls. Keeping family members and loved ones up to date with the events of your life and allowing them to feel more connected and involved in one another’s lives despite being so far apart.
The downside to being able to connect to your loved ones at any time is that, it’s a consistent intrusion on one’s life. There is no off or stop button, and people expect for you to answer your phone every time it rings. This not allowing people to truly ever be alone and disconnected from the world. The form of communication has also made mass communication like Facebook possible and communication has become less personal. Keeping updated with people lives no longer requires you to interact with them but their Facebook, Twitter and Instagram accounts.
In conclusion, it’s wonderful that people can connect so quickly over great distances but the art of connecting individually has become a lost art due to social media and is eroding key social skills required.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-20 | Rafia Jawad | 77 | view |
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 77 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | topraveesh | 88 | view |
| 2020-10-29 | Basil3241 | 72 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | sattar_iust | 88 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 141, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... intrusion on one's life. There is no off or stop button, and people expect f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 8.36945812808 227% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1405.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 274.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12773722628 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77892568085 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605839416058 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5070499962 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.076923077 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0769230769 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.46153846154 7.25397266985 34% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238411142222 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100302534148 0.0925447433944 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.157228456086 0.071462118173 220% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14488414209 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12125299415 0.0609392437508 199% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.