Packaging who's responsibility is it
With global warming and the push to conserve the environment, the use of plastic and packaging has been widely debated. In this essay, I will explore who are responsible for ensuring packaging has a minimum the impact on the planet.
With the population explosion, manufacturers taking different approaches to packaging goods in a different way for multiple different reasons.
Most producers are focused on the mass market clientele and are competing against millions of different variations of the same product. Packaging is used as a selling mechanism to draw consumers in, this making most packaging redundant. For example, a box around a toothpaste tube serves no other purposes than to advertise the product and make it more appealing by its ascetic’s. In many countries around the world governments have made laws to force producers to create environmentally friendly packaging and to dispose of meaningless packaging.
However, this is not enough, consumers need to make sure their purchasing habits align with products who try to decrease their impact on the environment. Being conscious of purchasing products that contain too much plastic.
In conclusion, we are both responsible for wasteful packaging and should make an effort to utilise products that are recyclable and biodegradable to help save our planet
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-03 | Aruna Matta | 55 | view |
| 2021-02-10 | honorrr | 88 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | honorrr | 77 | view |
| 2021-02-07 | honorrr | 77 | view |
| 2020-03-11 | gurlal sandhu | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...different approaches to packaging goods in a different way for multiple different reasons. Mos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 207.0 242.827586207 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46859903382 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08126985228 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.63768115942 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8129166638 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.2 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.3 7.25397266985 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218510864142 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0854089533923 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867342487158 0.071462118173 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121124865575 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788462571871 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.