As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it?
There is an increasingly ubiquitous belief that poverty acts as a deterrent to regional development. From my perspective, I totally agree with this idea.
There are various reasons why this phenomenon has a devastating effect on numerous communities. Firstly, poverty results in the degradation of the education system indispensable to enhance personal development. A substantial number of inhabitants, especially adolescents, barely having opportunities to accumulate knowledge due to the shortage of funds has a tendency to deteriorate the national development. Secondly, public health services will be exacerbated if poverty is perpetuated. As the healthcare system is incapable of providing citizens with cures for detrimental diseases which pose a threat to the human race, the figure for the population will experience a dramatic decline, minimizing the number of up-and-coming young people who could make a huge contribution to the regional development.
As a young and energetic generation, I am of the opinion that my peers and I have a vital role in the process of preventing poverty from continuously taking place. One utilitarian solution is that we will make strenuous efforts to associate with international technical assistance. If developing nations achieve support regarding innovative technology in manufacture and other fields, a myriad of commodities will be produced in a short period of time. Thus the unemployment rate will plummet significantly and there will be an increase in national income, paving the way for regional development. In order to implement the aforementioned method, the young generation should set their sight on taking their understanding further. Putting more effort into studying and participating in cultural exchange programs will be ideal choices for generation Z.
In conclusion, I believe young people should spend time accumulating knowledge and building a relationship with friends living beyond their national boundaries to contribute to national development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-31 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 95 | view |
| 2019-05-19 | Trần Mạnh Tiến | 11 | view |
- The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising but not the real need of the society where such products are sold. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places toentertain people, while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate.Discuss both views and give you own opinion 84
- Some people are born to be leaders, while others believe leadership can be learnt.Discuss both views and give opinion 84
- As an Asian youth, what do you think is the greatest challenge to regional development and what do you think is the role of young people in addressing it? 84
- Some people think that in the modern world we are more dependent oneach other, while others think that people have become more independent. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 438, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...commodities will be produced in a short period of time. Thus the unemployment rate will plumme...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 454, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... be produced in a short period of time. Thus the unemployment rate will plummet sign...
^^^^
Line 5, column 852, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... will be ideal choices for generation Z. In conclusion, I believe young people sh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1727.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79530201342 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40849912899 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610738255034 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.0607497836 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.357142857 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0675639655071 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0219818762476 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0243685735194 0.0667982634062 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0441557193113 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00867181343113 0.056905535591 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.35 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.