Parents should be held legally responsible for what their children have done. What is your opinion? Support it with examples.
Should parent be legally responsible to their children behavior becomes a controversial topic and eventually becomes an arguable topic. This topic is compelling two sides of arguments that parent is legally accountable to their children activity. The other argument is obviously not legally responsible to their children behavior in the society. In this essay, I will elaborate both sides of arguments and concluded mine one.
Under Australian law, the meaning of children is under age of 18, who are not either allow to vote or sign any legal document for themselves. All legal documents need their parents or guardians signatures or initials for acknowledge legal duty requirements. For example, children is not allowed to sign themselves in for any medical treatment. The rationale behind belief children is not matured enough to make a reasonable decision. In this case, parent has taken all their legal responsibility as primary carer of children to make the best interest decision for them. Under the same logic, parent is also take all their legal responsibility of their children behavior.
On the other, children has their own minds and personalities which are completely independent to their parents. Their value and belief possibly contradict to their parents in many cases. As an individual human being, their behavior should accountable only to themselves as other member in the society.
In my opinion, I am incline to agreed that children should take their own responsibility on their behavior. However, parent has responsibility to teach their children how to behavior as a responsible member in the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-06-05 | Carol Yuen | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-09 | Jigerdeep singh | 55 | view |
- Electric car is a solution to both transport and environment issues 80
- E-book are and will always superior to paper book 77
- Some people think that experiential learning (learning by doing) can work well in formal education; however others think that traditional form of teaching is the best. Discuss whether or not you think experiential learning can work well in high school and 77
- This is important to preserve the beautiful buildings of the past. Even if it will be expensive to do so. To what extent do you agree or disagree with it. 77
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for many reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and conclude. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...children is under age of 18, who are not either allow to vote or sign any legal d...
^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'voting'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: voting
...er age of 18, who are not either allow to vote or sign any legal document for themselv...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 21, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'inclined'.
Suggestion: inclined
...r in the society. In my opinion, I am incline to agreed that children should take the...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, for example, in many cases, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34241245136 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9740101687 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494163424125 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.6475613415 50.4703680194 39% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 91.5333333333 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1333333333 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.332133559509 0.242375264174 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137780809286 0.0925447433944 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066755939898 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220932779846 0.151781067708 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440461379994 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.