The bar chart below shows the numbers of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart demonstrates the proportion of university students who chose certain subjects in 2005, divided into 8 courses.
Overall, it is clear that the most common choices were Science and Mathematics for male undergraduates, whereas for females were Social Sciences and Languages.
Firstly, the number of male students enrolling to Science was dominant the females with 22000 learners versus exactly 10000 learners. In addition, for Mathematics courses, the figure of enrollment from boys was also fourth time higher than the girls' one, around 18000 versus with under 5000 students. In contrast, Social sciences were preferred more by the freshwomen, 25000 enrollees compared with 14000 respectively for freshmen. Furthermore, the number of female undergraduates were significantly higher than the number of male students who apply for languages courses, with 18000 in females and just approximately 2000 for males.
While the above subjects were differentiated noticeably, the number of boys and girls enter for Humanities courses were equal to 12000 applies for each gender. The students of the Arts fields also seems to be dominated by the freshwomen with 9000 versus about 3000 students to males. Literature had 15000 of males students while there are only 11000 of females' one, and the enrollees of the law were about 20000 with 15000 in males and 5000 in females enrollees.
- The youths should allocate time for cultural activities such as music and theatre rather than for sports 56
- Children should allow every parents' advice. 50
- Governments should introduce healthcare which prevents illness rather than cures it How far do you agree with this statement 88
- The diagrams demonstrate how the Earth's temperature is affected by the greenhouse effects through three stages. 84
- Motorways help people travel quickly and cover long distances, but they also cause problems. What are the problems of motorways and what solutions are there? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, as for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1186.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46543778802 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80265419991 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.4694200567 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 131.777777778 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1111111111 5.23603664747 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119403152288 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687010934135 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104157299212 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118659458157 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.136907978106 0.0819641961636 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 11.4140731707 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.