countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours
to what extent do you agree or disagree.
Economically, the more hours working those countries will spend the more successful they will be compared with those ones which spend fewer hours on labors. Although countries with long hours working will make much progress in economic, they will be involved with some drawbacks. In my opinion, countries with workaholic employers which put a lot of effort on working will make the most out of economic rather than those ones with less working hours.
Economically, if a country is enthusiastically looking for being successful, it should employ hard working employees to do their best in order to lead the country to set aside money and jewelry. Not only workaholic employees would not suffer from working for a long time but they also assist the country to utilize its people for various jobs and decline the average of jobless people. For example, America is the country that uses all its potential factors to save its energies such as gas electricity by the help of original residences. Having long hours workers will be an opportunity for each single country to heads up in the world.
On the other hand, the greatest disadvantage of working nonstop is that it can be a pain for people as they step by step grow older. It is worth mention that, human beings require enjoying from life; they are not able to make this fruitful issue happen with working hard though. Moreover, people have good energy when they are young even so if pass all their young periods of life in working, they will lose both energy and motivation. Therefore, they should be provided with a chance to divide working and living into two different categories the most out of each. Iranian people for instance spend most of their lives working for long hours to feed themselves but unfortunately when they become older they will regret about it. Spending your whole youth period as workers will have a regretful consequence as you grow older.
To sum up, those countries that spend a lot of time on working can be considered more successful economically than those spend less time on it. Even though putting a lot of effort on working would be beneficial for countries in the future, this issue will have detrimental effect on people’s desire and motivation for rest of their lives. These ultra-challenging explanations are paradoxically the main advantage of working hours since they can help countries get close to success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-29 | katenokk84 | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-28 | katenokk84 | 61 | view |
| 2020-05-24 | reza.sz70 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-18 | ehsansafari | 73 | view |
| 2020-03-31 | lostsonam | 84 | view |
- countries with long average working hours are economically more successful than those countries which do not work long hours to what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security Others think that people cannot expect to enjoy a job and that having a permanent job is more important Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that it is better to educate boys and girls in separate schools Others however believe that boys and girls benefit more from attending mixed schools classes Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that job satisfaction is more important than job security others think that people can not expect to enjoy a job and that having a permanent job is more important discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society Others however believe that school is the place to learn this Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Economically, the more hours working tho...
^^^^
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...e successful they will be compared with those ones which spend fewer hours on labors. Alt...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 422, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'those' instead.
Suggestion: those
...ke the most out of economic rather than those ones with less working hours. Econo...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... those ones with less working hours. Economically, if a country is enthusiast...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ngle country to heads up in the world. On the other hand, the greatest di...
^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...etful consequence as you grow older. To sum up, those countries that spend a ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, moreover, so, therefore, thus, even so, for example, for instance, such as, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2010.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 406.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95073891626 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48881294772 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64146915839 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509852216749 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 611.1 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 29.1418942418 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 125.625 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.375 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348283624889 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131084640467 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0895981619703 0.0667982634062 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240855993829 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100976939147 0.056905535591 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.