The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences. What extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people think that the only way to improve the safety on streets is providing much stricter punishments for drivers. In my opinion, I completely disagree that it is not the only way to improve the driving safety, there are some effective ways to improve the safety.
Regarding infrastructure and society, not only should governments develop the infrastructural systems to improve the driving safety, but they also provide some strict regalutions to decline violations while drivers are operating their vehicles. If some traffic regulations are strict, drivers are difficult to make a violation, such as driving through the red light. In some metropolises, moreover, more police stations should be created to control and manage the traffic. Admittedly, governments can provide more police stations, more traffic violations will decline. The number of accidents, therefore, might decline, and driving on streets are safer.
Regarding individuals, furthermore, people should pay their attention on their operations. Firstly, if their operations are effective, the number of accidents will fall down. Therefore, streets are much safer to drive. Moreover, people should control the speed while they are operating their vehicles. For example, if humans drive their vehicles with a speed, which is higher than the maximum speed, they cannot effectively control their vehicles when the accident circumstance happen. People, thus, make a crash on their roads. Therefore, people should drive their vehicles with the slow-driving to make roads much safer.
To sum up, I believe that providing much stricter punishments for drivers is not the only method to improve the safety on streets, some effective ways should be the cooperation between governments and individuals. Governments provide some regulations and individuals should be proactive to create more safe streets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-12 | rajpatel90 | 78 | view |
| 2020-10-14 | Tuan Harry | 89 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 73 | view |
| 2020-06-10 | Alex.X.Hg@5141 | 67 | view |
- Five Major Types of Fast Food Eaten in Melbourne units 2005 Present 2025 Hamburgers 40 38 51 Fried Chicken 35 37 45 Salads 5 15 41 Fried Rice 6 9 9 Noodles 6 8 9 85
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarise the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online Is this a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 67
- The only way to improve safety on our roads is to give much stricter punishments for driving offences What extent do you agree or disagree 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, regarding, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66312056738 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89246300518 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 176.041082164 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496453900709 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.43340972 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8125 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.6875 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204732806754 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0780319761442 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101286411782 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162906519863 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119923339654 0.056905535591 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.