Advertising Fast food
Some people against and some are not. Discuss both view
Nowadays, Fast foods is an emerging industry attracting many businesses to invest because of profits it brings. As a result, many fast food companies have spent thousands of dollars encouraging people to consume their products through advertising. Many people against with this action while the opposites are not. Both views will be discussed in this essay.
To begin, it is argued that abusing advertisement to promote junk food can make people have misunderstanding about its effect to human health. Many surveys has proved eating too much junk food can be one of the main factor resulting in obesity, especially in children, the group easily influenced by media. In addition to contribute to obesity, it also can cause blood pressure and other heart diseases for human, which any fast food advertisemts has not revealed to their consumers. Apart from that, many views also believe that advertising should encourage people to keep fit rather than try to ruin their health.
However, some people have views contrary to the point above, and claim that human beings should have freedom to chose what they want and that make democratic society. For instance, consumers can choose to buy fast food without forced by any regulations or rules as long as they know the limit. Moreover, with many people, junk food is more appealing than healthy food because of its affordable prices. Particularly, it is suitable for the budget of some household which are struggled to make a living in cities. Apart from that, many new versions of fast food has been launched such as “diet” versions which can both bring convienient and “keep fit” effects for consumers without distracting by obesity or heart diseases.
To sump up, based on mentioned explanations, individuals should take in consideration benifits and drawbacks through the growing prevalence of advertisements about fast food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-02 | LauraTing | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-20 | hien3112 | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-19 | chino0301 | 84 | view |
| 2024-09-06 | Tuan Harry | 93 | view |
| 2024-09-02 | Trần Ánh Vy | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the diferences in wheat exports over three different areas 67
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- Advertising Fast food Some people against and some are not Discuss both view 84
- The average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line services 2001 2010 67
- The diagram below shows how geothermal energy is used to produce electricity 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ts effect to human health. Many surveys has proved eating too much junk food can b...
^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eys has proved eating too much junk food can be one of the main factor resulting ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22772277228 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74235780125 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600660066007 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1044678194 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329609603408 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103569208147 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377411725589 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181472139923 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515639754858 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 156, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...ts effect to human health. Many surveys has proved eating too much junk food can b...
^^^
Line 2, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eys has proved eating too much junk food can be one of the main factor resulting ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1584.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22772277228 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74235780125 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600660066007 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1044678194 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.142857143 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6428571429 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.329609603408 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103569208147 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377411725589 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181472139923 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515639754858 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.