Scientist and the news media are presenting ever more evidence of climate change. Governments cannot be expected to solve this problem. It is the responsibility of individuals to change their lifestyle to prevent further damage. Give reasons and examples from your own knowledge and experience.
Environmental protection, a remarkable issue, has become a humans duty. Some people state that the most consequence of this problem is not only concern with the government but also individuals’ lifestyle. I believe that both government and residents should cooperate to prevent this condition of climate damage.
On the one hand, residents do not only play great percents in population but also their lifestyle and behaviour are caused by environmental damage problems. Individuals should use public transport instead of driving their vehicles, or choose electric cars rather than fuel vehicles. Also, they can choose to ride a bicycle while moving short distances. In this case, it can reduce gasoline and gas impact on our earth. For those reasons, changing lifestyles, a great way, have reduced emissions and global temperature impact on the environment.
On the other hand, the government also should support in terms of policy and define rules or tax due to pollutions. They can build waste processed factories or recycling laws, and manufacture eco-friendly products. Also, the government has accepted laws concerning air quality and cleaning to define a policy and extra taxed against smoking in public places. When a country can reduce its waste such as plastic products, and reuse effectively it in the lifestyle, it will be useful method factors for our earth.
In conclusion, the environmental issue is global problems, since every individual of countries has to take responsibility to act effectively in eco-friendly protection methods. Both citizens and government play a key role to prevent global warming.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-02-10 | Jenifer Nguyen | 61 | view |
2021-09-23 | sheru | 87 | view |
2020-10-23 | oprah86 | 61 | view |
2019-10-15 | Mandy3456 | 92 | view |
2019-07-19 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 56 | view |
- Many modern films and television programs about past events and people contain a mixture of fact and fiction Some people say this distorts the public s view of history and should therefore be discouraged What are your views 87
- You work in a busy but poorly organized office and you are keen to be promoted Your employer needs to find a new supervisor for your department Write a letter to your employer In the letter ask to be considered for this job explain why you would be a suit 71
- In the context of today s competitive global economy the main purpose of a country s education system is to prepare young people for particular types of work rather than to help them develop into independent thinking individuals 79
- In your view what is the most important thing for governments to spend money on education health transportation or something else Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 77
- Very few schoolchildren learn about the value of money and how to look after it yet this is a critical life skill that should be taught as part of the school curriculum Do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...ction, a remarkable issue, has become a humans duty. Some people state that the most c...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45059288538 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0012365504 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.640316205534 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8187727925 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.5 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 7.06120827912 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.139496681559 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0445644166142 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377121427748 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0848711513642 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0390986531197 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.