In some countries, owning a home rather than renting one is very important for people. Why might this be the case? Do you think it is a positive or negative situation?
Without a shadow of a doubt, with the afoot progress in the augmentation of cities, some issues are gradually becoming important, notwithstanding a while ago there were not. One of them is associated with home-related matters such as leasing, renting or purchasing, etc. In some societies, denizens desire to be the proprietor of their home while others prefer renting it for a time. This issue comes from some opinions, which is varying from country to county and from a person to person, and I postulate it has both advantages and disadvantages per se. In this essay, it will be essayed to cover all facets.
Some people would like to purchase accommodation while others would rather rent it. The former group put forward that if they have their own home they can embellish and adorn their home according to what they like. Moreover, after a while dwindling in a specific place they become familiar and acquaintance with the neighbors and atmosphere of that area. The latter group avers that they can change their living place whenever they want and secure a home according to their desideratum and single out a local base on their disposition, i.e. a tumult area or tranquilized one. Hence, it seems this matter exhaustively depends on the persons and their notion.
This situation has its own positive and negative aspects. If a person lives for a while in a quarter they deprive themselves of going through other places and they have to adapt themselves to a situation. On the other hand, they know under any circumstances have they a place for living. About the latter group, having a predilection for renting accommodation, the situation is vice versa, i.e. they always experience a new district and neighbors, but may have to live in an area where they do not like. For instance, if a person from the latter group could rent a home in an upper-class neighbor last year with a given rent, they have to search for a home in a lower-class neighbor now with that money.
To recapitulate briefly, this issue stems from the tendency and opinion of people and brings a positive and negative situation. To boil down why it happens, we can say: (1) adapting to accommodation and neighbor, and (2) experiencing different homes. And to blueprint its advantage and disadvantage, we put forward: (1) having a place for living forever, and (2) roaming in cities for finding a suitable home.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-02-24 | Elahe13 | 61 | view |
2023-07-19 | ThHuong | 61 | view |
2023-05-06 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 61 | view |
2021-12-06 | vothienlykhach | 78 | view |
2021-07-09 | shaunak_vyas | 56 | view |
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this a positive or negative development 84
- The charts show Chart a the average speed of urban zone traffic in kilometers per hour or kph in a number of countries over a fifty year period including a future estimate and also Chart b the total number of urban zones per country in thousands 100
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant has been deleted 73
- In some countries young people have become richer healthier and live longer but they are less happy What are the causes What can be done to address this situation 84
- The table below shows the expenditures of four car companies on advertising in the UK in 2002 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 421, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me. This issue comes from some opinions, which is varying from country to county ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, hence, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 24.0651302605 179% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1979.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 407.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86240786241 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49157444576 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83737724545 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53316953317 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 618.3 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5339078278 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.944444444 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6111111111 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.05555555556 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223887050064 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799839979828 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0618527413974 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138460477524 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288889804277 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.