People are living longer after they retire. What are the problems? What can be done to solve the problems?
It is believe that life expectancy is improved among retirees. While this tendency can give rise to some issues, governments can implement several measures to tackle them.
The enhancement of longevity after people retire can cause both society as a whole and pensioners themselves to face several problems. On a societal level, increased life spans may burden a country’s healthcare systems. In fact, the elders are likely to experience many existing conditions or be predisposed to a number of diseases, such as diabetes, stroke, cardiovascular disease, all of which require a great volume of medical resources, including pharmaceuticals, equipment, and human forces for treatment. Thus, if the number of retirees keep growing, the country’s medication systems would fail to provide them with adequate health services. Furthermore, residents living longer after retiring may pressure their nation’s pension fund. Particularly, the proportion of the elders eligible for pensions may outnumber the percentage of contributors, which would disrupt or even make the fund collapse in the long run. On an individual front, most retirees tend to suffer from financial insecurity, which may be attributed to higher living costs resulted from inflation and low pensions that make these people struggle to sustain their retiring life. Therefore, improvements in life span can subject a nation to burdens on its healthcare and pension systems as well as the elders to economically unstable life.
Given these problems, national authorities can adopt several policies to address them. Firstly, governments can re-allocate their budget to spend a larger share on strengthening their medication systems, such as equipping with more facilities, competent human resources, by which they will become more well-prepared for the rising number of patients retiring. Another solution is that authorities should legislate for changes in the pension schemes, requiring working people to contribute a bigger block of their salaries to the national pension fund in their working years, which will guarantee pensioners a more secure financial support. Finally, regional governments should encourage local households and businesses to create more employment prospects for the retirees, such as gardening, babysitting, home catering, which can allow them to monetize and have less reliance on the pension fund.
In conclusion, pensioners with improved life expectancies may result in some issues for themselves and society as a whole. Fortunately, national authorities can deal with the problems by upgrading their healthcare systems, adjusting pension schemes, and provide retirees with proper job opportunities.
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Some others however think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give you opinions 84
- The world of work is rapidly changing and people cannot depend on having the same job and working conditions for life What are the causes of this rapid change How can people prepare for their future work life 89
- Some people think that personal happiness is directly affected by economic success Some others however think that there are completely different factors that are more important Discuss both views and give you opinions 84
- When cars and cyclists use the same roads there are often problems Why is this the case What are the solutions 84
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 7, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'believed'.
Suggestion: believed
It is believe that life expectancy is improved among ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2305.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 399.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77694235589 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04041739136 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 705.6 506.74238477 139% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.0724940514 49.4020404114 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.0625 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9375 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4375 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124154741655 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442807794484 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490335890633 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703559619628 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295397548557 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 13.0946893788 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 50.2224549098 60% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 78.4519038076 172% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.