In today’s world, private companies rather than government pay for and conduct most scientific research. Do you think the advantages outweigh disadvantages?
Currently it is private enterprises that replace the authority in shouldering the major responsibility for funding and discovering scientific advancements. While its benefits are discernible, it seems to me that this tendency brings about more detriments.
On the one hand, the merits of research driven by private firms can be clearly seen from a financial perspective. In fact, scientific discovery involves a massive investment despite it will yield a fruitful result or not, so when the government’s finite resources are allocated to this field, the policy may be unacceptable due to the uncertainty of an adequate outcome. For example, British authority was criticized for its investment in cancer therapy development, which was deemed as a squandering after clinical trials failed. Therefore, not only can private participation assure resources for science projects but also reduce burden on national budget. By contrast, if the state remained obliged to provide public spending for such missions, this may use up funding that can support other urgent issues, and result in instability for scientific research as government decision-making can be easily overturned when social outcry levels up.
On the other hand, I opine that privately run scientific research leads to a number of drawbacks. To begin with, obviously, since companies in a certain industry only pour money into relevant science activities, a scientific environment mostly relying on private sector may neglect several fields that are commercially insignificant. Consequently, a number of social components may degrade or be put to the verge of oblivion due to its lack of further study. Additionally, enterprises inherently conduct scientific research just to promote their business, so their involvement raises question marks over such discoveries’ accuracy and transparency. Indeed, when a study is sponsored by a company, this casts doubts over whether researchers abide by ethical codes, or results are manipulated to serve the firms’ interests.
Briefly, although research managed by private companies contributes to remarkable social betterment, I believe that its benefits are outweighed by the disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | riyapatel30 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-26 | chinh11111 | 89 | view |
| 2022-05-25 | vialia | 73 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | Blueberry123 | 78 | view |
| 2021-08-03 | tamle | 78 | view |
- The line graph below provides the number of international conferences in three cities from 1965 to 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pie charts below show the main regions that received exports from 3 Latin America countries in 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 78
- the maps below show an art gallery in Australia in 1950 and now 78
- The table shows the number of employees and factories producing silk in England and Wales between 1851 and 1901 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Nowadays sport is becoming a big business with high earning for professional sportsmen and a lot of companies have involved in financially and in other ways What are the advantages and disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 945, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...verturned when social outcry levels up. On the other hand, I opine that privatel...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 167, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts are outweighed by the disadvantages.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, while, for example, in fact, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73170731707 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25177272844 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631097560976 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.9311977145 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.615384615 106.682146367 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2307692308 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201803605211 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0688893218266 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421294817576 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119671905789 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261168016264 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 78.4519038076 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.