Some people think it is more important to plant more herein open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Plantation of trees is more important in extra lands such as in town and urban areas rather than building construction thinks by community members. I completely disagree with the above-mentioned statement. This essay will substantiate my opinion in the following paragraphs with relevant examples.
In the era of the developing world, the shelters are basic. The necessity for life rather than trees. Although trees are needed for good environmental sanitation, accommodation was demanding for better living standards. No sooner requirement of more money and lifestyle, society members think to shift from backward area to developing the lodge but without housing, it only increases the slums areas which improved Negativity as well as it leads to poor health standards. For instance, if someone or any family move to one village to urbanize location to improve living standard and they can not find rent house or lodge to stay at that time they went to a backwards area of town for find place of living. It indirectly increases a crowded as well as the slums area progressions.
Moreover, there is a lack is space available in the city area and priorities should be given to the necessity (housing) rather than a luxury (peaceful environment, trees, parks and gardening ). Furthermore, housing is necessary for city development and generate revenue for the country. According to a survey conducted by order of parliament, community health worker conducts a survey and at last as a result of high footpath living people. The government announced to provide accommodation to the lower cast family for free because homeless people are the root of the cause of crime such as alcoholism and drug induce and much more crime.
To conclude that, living residents far better than peace, according to my point of view they should construct a new building for stay and developer the growth of the city.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-19 | too3ig | 67 | view |
| 2021-04-21 | sandhu harman | 84 | view |
| 2021-02-09 | ajit brar | 61 | view |
| 2021-01-19 | ajit brar | 56 | view |
| 2021-01-18 | VIDHI PARMAR | 84 | view |
- The graph below gives information about the numbers of cases of diarrhoea in Mashhad between 1983 and 1992
- Some people think it is more important to plant more herein open areas in towns and cities than provide more housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The Graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kind of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In many parts of world children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this happening How should children or teenagers be punished 56
- Nowadays families are not as close as they used to be What do you think are the causes of this What can be done to make families closer 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 756, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'slums'' or 'slum's'?
Suggestion: slums'; slum's
...ctly increases a crowded as well as the slums area progressions. Moreover, there i...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... environment, trees, parks and gardening . Furthermore, housing is necessary for c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, for instance, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13915857605 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88702288606 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598705501618 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.6477924462 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.428571429 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187125521972 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0579311105925 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629620468618 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109841331651 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0573413419414 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.