A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
In recent years, a great deal of concerns about humans’ actions towards animals have been interested in many parts of the world. While there is a school of thought that animals should be given the rights as humans and the exploitation of them should not be banned, I have also heard another option that humans can use animals for needs such as the sources of food or studies.
On the one hand, the belief associated with humanity and ethical religion is that humans’ actions are leading to painfulness and violence for animals as a result of demands of food and experiments, so it should be struggled for animals’ rights. It is argued humans will be able to find other supplements for not only our food but also tests instead of using animals. Whereas humans can use many kinds of agricultural products for eating, for example, beans can be substituted for animal protein, eating animals’ physical bodies would not be necessary, which is compared with muder in many religious beliefs like Buddhims. When it comes to experiments with animals, it is also debated why humans can bring harmfulness or vulnerability to animals because of medicine and vaccines used for ourselves. According to surveys of many press, animals are victims suffering from being kept in small cages or violences due to scientific research.
On the other hand, it is the opposite that animals should be employed to meet humans’ demands of both food and studies. Without any doubt, almost all humans have been familiar with food sources made from animals, despite ideas of the minority of vegetarians over the world. Obviously, animals’ bodies contain loads of rich vitamins and nutrition that vegetables cannot actually replace. In addition, unless it is found out a safer and more effective method to practice experiment such as on production of brand-new medicine, and on testing effectiveness of vaccines, animals, for instance mice and flies, would still be the best choice by scientists. Those things would serve for advancements of human beings, which will lead to better life later.
In conclusion, both using animals for food and research and the rights for animals have still been debated that each would exist right to some extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-19 | mytinh | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-18 | snowacealex | 84 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Alexspector | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-17 | Lê Nguyễn Hạnh Dung | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-06 | bapcai | 73 | view |
- The maps show the changes of the road access to a hospital between 2007 and 2010 Describe the main features of the maps 73
- Art is considered an important part of a society as well as an expression of its culture Do you think it is important for children to be taught art Do you think children should be encouraged to focus on art rather than other subjects 89
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 67
- In many countries household waste eg Food packing is increasing day by day What are the reasons How can this problem be solved 67
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 822, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun press seems to be countable; consider using: 'many presses'.
Suggestion: many presses
... for ourselves. According to surveys of many press, animals are victims suffering from bei...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, still, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0625 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63978166657 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551630434783 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.6528247074 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.307692308 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3076923077 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2307692308 7.06120827912 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.400479939991 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.160021427901 0.084324248473 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106614817377 0.0667982634062 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277117019893 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669305104645 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.