As people live longer and longer, the idea of cloning human beings in order to provide spare parts is becoming a reality. The idea horrifies most people, yet it is no longer mere science fiction. To what extent do you agree with the such a procedure? Have you any reservations?
Human beings have turned their dreams of living longer into reality with medical advancement. The replica of body organs becomes possible with the assistance of cloning. However, some people frightened from the consequences of this scientific technique. Here, I support the idea of creating organs and substantiate my point of view in the forthcoming paragraphs.
A bunch of merits can be considered to support my point of view. Firstly, the technique of cloning could be lucrative to blessed the prestigious persons such as doctors, engineers and lawyers with longer life as it becomes possible to change the life as it becomes possible to change the damage parts with the new ones. Furthermore, a commendable role is played by cloning in saving the lives of valuable persons who are the owner of exceptional flairs which cannot be imitated by others. Consequently, living longer allows such a person to bestows their services for a long time which are worthwhile for a nation.
Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initially, there could be wide availability of body organs at economic cost with the help of cloning. To elucidate, it is not a piece of cake for destitute people to buy body organs due to its scarcity and higher price but when organs would be produced by following the process of cloning so they could be easily attained by poverty stricken people to save the precious lives of people. On the other side, poor people do not have any other alternative except death under the absence of easy availability of body parts. Therefore, it is apparently seen that the cloning, the greatest invention of scientist has a big bag of merits.
To recapitulate, undeniably the invention of scientists deserve huge appreciation. However, they should be properly analyzed in order to prevent the mishappenings and used for the wellbeing of mankind.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-16 | Luisjackiet | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Koi | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | cleee | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | tung0303 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Luisjackiet | 73 | view |
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement what other measures and do you think might be effective 84
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010 84
- Some people believe that competition as children to be better prepared for their future while others say that competition can be harmful for children and should be invited to adults discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- In some countries population is getting older are the benefits of Aging population on society is negative for positive Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Childcare training courses should be mandatory for all parents Do you agree or disagree with this statement given your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... role is played by cloning in saving the lives of valuable persons who are the ow...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Further,
...e which are worthwhile for a nation. Further emphasizing on my point of view. Initia...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07166123779 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8750721657 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57328990228 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8052124104 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.8 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239763298357 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.066469214995 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616507710477 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132177506787 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665901789795 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.