In today’s world of advanced science and technology, many still greatly value artists such as musicians, painters and writers. What can the arts tell us about life that science cannot?
Today’s world witnesses the dramatically accelerating advance of science and technology, which instigates worldwide digitalization. Nonetheless, art, itself don’t follow suit, but ironically still stands the test of the time. From my own perspectives, this emanates from irreplaceable value of art to the world.
To start with, that art enables individuals to express themselves without obligation considerately reinforce its ascendancy. Not only is this capacity of art crucial to mental well-being of human but also imperative to the diversity of world culture. Obviously enough, via manifesting intense emotions and thoughts through our art works, we can alleviate negative feelings or show our true color to everyone. This explains the popularity of music or paintings classes as an efficacious method for relaxation and shelf-expression. In the aggregate, it stands to reason that the cumulative perspectives depicted by art projects will enrich the culture and therefore the society. Take the Renaissance as an example, one of the effulgent milestone of human history, was the era of art’s efflorescence.
Second of all, art manifest itself as a supreme apparatus to impart meaning, moral lessons. If science is the key to the paradigm of the universe then arts is the scrupulous mirror reflecting it, the magical glasses of human’s soul. I can cite Les Miserable as an apotheosis. This masterpiece novel itself represent complicated emotion development, priceless lessons about humanity, altruism. It, additionally, provides readers with extricate insight of French history.
In conclusion, the arts still occupy a prominent position in society as they allow for individual self-expression and the creation of ideals.
- More and more people are relying on their private cars as a major means of transportation Describe some of the problems over reliance on cars can cause and suggest at least one possible solution 89
- The charts below show the percentage of the energy generate from different resources in a country in 1985 and 2003 To summarize information by selecting key characteristics and compiling a report and if necessary make a comparison 78
- Some believe that people should make efforts to fight climate change while others think it is better to learn to live with it Discuss both views and give your own opinion 65
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72586872587 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29408123972 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69111969112 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.921378459 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17156645659 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510545960162 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414075976564 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102628224606 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545860496599 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, nonetheless, second, so, still, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72586872587 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29408123972 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69111969112 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 466.2 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.921378459 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17156645659 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510545960162 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414075976564 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102628224606 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545860496599 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.