Some people think that developing countries need financial help from international organizations. Others think that it is practical aid and advice that is needed. Discuss these views and give your own opinion.
People usually have difficulty the view about help from multinational organizations. Somebody is said that the support money would have benefits and promises. While In my opinion, I contend that other help, both practical aid and advice would more have helpful.
To begin with, the financial support of some international organizations is quite popular. They could more spend money to provide for some countries that need help from them. This help way would be consistent with the countries that often endure economical deprivation. They don't have much money to develop their country. For example, Africa is a poorly developed country, people are in poverty and lack food, water and also clothes on the body. So they have needed finances to improve the life and improve the human being there. They have had money to invest in technology, education, industrial field and others aspect. Consequently, the more money those underprivileged nations receive, the sooner they shake off poverty.
On the other hand, developing countries, they short of well-educated workforce, instruction and guidelines. So the support financially is thought unnecessary because no international organizations could support the amount of huge money. These countries need specialists in economics for advice about the line of attack to help them more develop. In other words, those international should send advisers to these nations to instruct the locals on how to improve methods the country that help them have eyeshot new strategy.
In conclusion, international organizations could help the countries with money or advice and practice aid suitable for each nation. Personally, I believe the way: practical aid and advice are far the most effective ways.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-19 | Yamin_j | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-25 | vidung | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-19 | daoduong3204 | 73 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Pham Phuong Trinh | 56 | view |
| 2021-11-07 | minhminhvu7 | 67 | view |
- Many people think modern communication technology is having some negative effects on social relationships Do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 61
- Consumers are faced with increasing numbers of advertisements from competing companies To what extent do you think consumers are influenced by advertisements What measures can be taken to protect them 61
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel Do you agree or disagree with this view 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aid and advice would more have helpful. To begin with, the financial support of ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 276, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ten endure economical deprivation. They dont have much money to develop their countr...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 270.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45555555556 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92964835879 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574074074074 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0994579805 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.6470588235 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8823529412 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76470588235 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306193532118 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990579240897 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.069814878697 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196740313862 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0260827302025 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.09 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.