the prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicine. Government funding should reflect this.
to what extent do you agree?
It is argued that preventative approaches, rather than curative ones, to health issues should be funded. Although such view might be true to a certain extent, these two approaches are of great importance of people’s well-being in equal measure.
Investments in increasing the public awareness of causes of diseases as well as early detection tests have proved to provident decisions. Apparently, health is the greatest asset of a nation, so if the ordinary, especially the working class who is likely prone to varied work hazards, is well equipped with knowledge and means of protecting and enhancing their wellness, not only lives but also budget for universal health care will be saved. For example, tax revenues from taxing junk foods can be utilized to subsidize regular medical check-ups, informing people of their overall health status, or to install more public sports equipment so that people are encouraged to adopt active lifestyles, thus effectively enhancing their immune system.
It is also, however, of note there are many diseases requiring treatment. Such illnesses can be hereditary or recently detected such as cancer or covid-19 which are astronomically expensive to be cured. Therefore, were there insufficiency of governmental fundings for hospitals, there would be an alarming rise in the death toll, severely crippling a country’s economy as well as workforce. As a result, it is safe to conclude that over-emphasis on one measure to health problems over the other will likely result in an inability to address complex problems. In fact, despite being aware of the idea that prevention is better cure, many developed countries continue to spend an enormous amount of money on devising innovative cures and medication.
in conclusion, there should be a balance between prevention and treatment. Otherwise, a country could confront with either a great number of people facing preventable diseases or a high death rate from unpreventable ones.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | vidung | 95 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-03 | Revivo Tulaseket | 73 | view |
- Museums and art galleries should focus on works that show the history and culture of their own country rather than works of other parts of the world To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The advancement of internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how people in other places live To what extent do you agree or disagree 93
- Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside Other believe that there are health benefits of living in cities Discuss both views and give your opinions 89
- Only government action can solve housing shortages in big cities to what extent do you agree or disagree 90
- Nowadays experience is more valued in the workplace than knowledge in many countries Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 93
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 603, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le of their overall health status, or to install more public sports equipment so ...
^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ng innovative cures and medication. in conclusion, there should be a balance b...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1674.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41747572816 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94343997373 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650485436893 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.4417390429 49.4020404114 147% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.5 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132962544476 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534585430398 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473218708769 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868080092507 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323952574329 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.5 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.