Nowadays, international tourism is the biggest industry in the world. Unfortunately, international tourism creates tension rather than understanding between people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
It is transparently true that international tourism has become the main contributing factor to the world’s economy. Whereas there are several worries concerning tensions that are potentially triggered, my conviction is that this industry is indispensable to both economic development and cultural dissemination among nations.
On the one hand, the reason why the proliferation of tourism would not bring conflict is rooted in the economic motivation for both locals and visitors. By purchasing products quintessential to a region such as traditional amusements, local specialities, souvenirs, and other bric-a-brac designated for ex-pats, not only do foreign tourists enormously contribute to the regional revenue but also spread the culture and tradition of the country to their homeland. In turn, the indigenous should express their hospitality towards the newcomers in exchange for their trust and financial contribution. As a result, not only does such reciprocal relation generate sustainable incomes for locals but it also exposes visitors to an extended horizon. For instance, Thailand is prevalent for its hospitality industry which offers the most memorable and qualified experience in diverse entertainments and foreigner-friendliness and gives a substantial rise to the domestic economy.
On the other hand, there might be the repulse of visitors against the local conventions at the initial stage when they first arrive, which is attributed to the discrepancies in religious belief, social background and cultural values. However, most offences are accidental rather than intentional and can be settled instantaneously when foreign visitors acknowledge the local customs. Taking the Arabians as an example, they used to consider westerners as their foes and this seemed to prolong intermittently. And yet, as time flew, they formed concrete relations with their western allies in distinguished fields.
In conclusion, from my point of view, international tourism does not prompt any hostilities in the long run but fosters both economic flourishing and the diversity of cultures.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-04 | 2xhptaljahy | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-20 | chaupnh | 89 | view |
| 2022-11-17 | vishal sachdeva | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-03 | Lê Khánh Diệp | 84 | view |
| 2022-07-27 | nhattram39 | 89 | view |
- Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same roads causes some problems What are the problems and what can be done to reduce them 89
- In today s world of advanced science and technology we still greatly value our artists such as musicians painters and writers What can arts tell us about life that science and technology cannot 89
- Some people think the government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture while others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- Internet technology means people do not need to travel to foreign countries to understand how others live To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1788.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78640776699 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35842817535 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621359223301 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8087724023 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.75 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133433289382 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0482954368892 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480669646598 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0955084132535 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560326963162 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.7 13.0946893788 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.65 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 9.78957915832 174% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.