Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree?
People have different views concerning the question of how to tackle juvenile severe crimes. While there are some valid arguments opposing immature offenders should be punished with the same penalties as mature offenders, I still hold the belief that the level of penalties should be considered depending on the age.
On the one hand, it is believed that all serious crimes should be received heavy punishments due to the fact today's crime rates are witnessing an upward trend in every aspect of life, posing a great threat to life’s safety. Even though, the phenomenon seems becoming worse and worse among the youth because juvenile delinquency is an alarming issue these days. Therefore, heavy punishments need to be taken into consideration as deterrent effects in order to educate other teenagers. Furthermore, with lighter punishment, they may not have a full perception of unlawful behaviors, leading to unacknowledge of such illegal activities in comparison to adult crimes. Consequently, they will re-offend, and this may put a risk to the life of innocent people, far beyond society as a whole.
On the other hand, I am very much convinced that we should treat juvenile criminals in distinctive ways compared to adult ones. The first reason springs from the youth experiencing a development period, thereby not having a holistic cognition so that they may not distinguish clearly right and wrong behavior. Unless they are served a great education, they will be conducive to committing illegal behavior, influencing their future life. The second reason lies in that although the prospect of technological advancement creates more opportunities for them to have access to a wealth sources of information, it spontaneously shows improper documentation, violent action films for example. As a result, some children break the law just because they mimic the character’s actions through movies. In addition, there are other useful forms of punishment. For instance, they can be sent to rehabilitation centers for educational purposes. Another method is forcing them to engage in unpaid work at the community centers. These approaches not only wake them up but also help them make contributions to local communities.
In conclusion, though there are practical reasons to support equal punishments for all ages, this alternation would be unfair to young people. Courts should consider comprehensive factors before selecting an appropriate punishment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-09 | Raspreet s. | 84 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Raspreet s. | 47 | view |
| 2023-02-09 | Harman97 | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-01-14 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
- Topic The chart below shows the percentages of five kinds of magazines sold by a company in the UK between 2001 and 2009 89
- In the past people stored knowledge in books Nowadays people store knowledge on the internet Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagrams show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 78
- Some people think that schools should select students according to their academic abilities while others believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together Discuss both views and state your own opinion 89
- Topic The diagram below shows the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44240837696 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01181963882 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651832460733 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5763272305 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182597579754 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446645207311 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524975130641 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112421049094 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350565164062 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, second, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2079.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 382.0 315.596192385 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44240837696 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42095241839 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01181963882 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 176.041082164 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651832460733 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 647.1 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.5763272305 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.5 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.77777777778 7.06120827912 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182597579754 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446645207311 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524975130641 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112421049094 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0350565164062 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 78.4519038076 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.