Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Regulations regarding environmental maintenance have been a controversial topic for the past few decades. Therefore, many people believe that this colossal conundrum should be resolved by world authorities. Throughout this essay, I will reveal aspects of this point and express my views.

Firstly, due to the current irreversible increase in the number of people in the world, it takes enormous effort to reduce any harmful effects on the environment. Countless industrial businesses and other daily activities that people need to adopt in order to thrive and maintain their lives propel mother nature into detriment to various extents. Only governments have the ability to tackle the problem via their legal power over enterprises and citizens.

Having said that, corruption is unavoidable in these legal machines since they are heavily human-involved. So, it is the people’s voice and awareness that plays an integral role in correcting and advising their leaders. It is impossible to condone wrongdoing when people raise their voices against it. Every individual is equipped with such a powerful and righteous voice, and one must be self-aware and act in that manner every single day.

When it comes to implementing environmental protection measures, it is undeniable that world leaders possess considerable authority and power. However, I consider myself a big believer in the superiority of the majority, which means that everyone could join hands to take action.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-11 Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ 78 view
2023-05-12 Spring123 61 view
2023-03-03 TLan168 73 view
2023-02-25 TLan168 56 view
2023-02-25 TLan168 11 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, regarding, so, therefore

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 227.0 315.596192385 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52863436123 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97456338383 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.713656387665 0.561755894193 127% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.3104309145 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.583333333 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9166666667 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.08333333333 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0697937358078 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0224170447448 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295477407344 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038598731323 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014302524524 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.