It is as important for school children to study music, art and sport as it is for them to become literate and numerate.' How far do you agree with this statement? Support your point of view with reasons and / or examples from your own experience.
Co-curricular activities are equally important for children as are academic studies. Some people think that children must be encouraged to partiipate in co-curricular activities like arts, music and sports, while others maintain that academic studies are more important than participation in other activities. This essay will discuss the importance of co-curricular activites for students.
Firstly, there are myriad of arguments in favour of participation in arts, music and sports. To begin with, a healthy mind and a physical fit child can only excel and grow in his life. Therefore, participation in sports boosts the physical health condition of a student and inculcates various traits of sportsmanship that cannot be taught through academic courses. Moreover, participation in arts and music allows students to explore their hidden talents and ease out their academic tensions. Hence, the importance of participation in co-curricular activities cannot be overruled.
Furthermore, the exposure provided to the students by arts and music allows them to have a better insight and understanding of the world. Additionally, numerous personality shades cannot be exposed and polished by theoratical studies and thus participation in sports activities allows a student to further polish those skills. As an example, a sportsman will have more strong nerves than a student who is performing extremely marvellous in academic arena only. So, it is unquestionable that only academic and literary studies can produce well groomed and educated citizens.
In conclusion, participation in activites like arts, music and sports is extremely important as it allows a student to explore the world and overcome the shortcomings in his peronality. However, I opine that these ventures polish and inculcate various traits in a student which cannot be shaped by academic studies.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-28 | SB83 | 77 | view |
| 2018-04-28 | Anonymous | 80 | view |
| 2018-04-14 | dhavalpatel095 | 85 | view |
| 2018-04-14 | dhavalpatel095 | 77 | view |
| 2018-03-14 | imala1 | 82 | view |
- Some people spend too much time on work than their personal/private life and experience time shortage. What problems does it cause. 77
- Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
- Whether experimental learning can work well in formal education agree or disagree Or Experience is a more effective way to teach compared to books Agree or disagree 58
- Claim An piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted since it may well be proven false in the future Reason Much of the information that people assume is factual turns out to be inaccurate Write a response in which you discuss the exte 50
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packaged products or is it the responsibility of producers? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67259786477 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17800169698 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519572953737 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3177879246 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.857142857 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.25397266985 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116377996569 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475026005704 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361179609978 0.071462118173 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0742139120843 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033170838737 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.