The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of car ownership, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of traffic congestion and pollution has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on our environment in recent years. It can be agreed that the ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family. This essay will elaborate both positive and negative impacts of this topic and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous ways to explain why we should limit car ownership, but the most conspicuous one is rooted in the fact that reducing the number of cars can resolve many issues related to traffic and environment, which can help to improve our living standard. As an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals that human’s living standard has improved significantly in recent years after government put a restriction. Thus, it is apparent that limiting car ownership has some obvious benefits.
Nevertheless, opponents of this trend tend to believe that in some cases the restriction might not necessarily lead to a positive outcome, which can cause many dramatic problems and permanently damage the environment. For example, according to a new research from Harvard University, the environment has become more polluted and traffic congestions happen more often when the government decided to ban this act. Therefore, it is obviously true that this policy might not be the best option.
In view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that, limiting the ownership of car is prominent, although it has a number of drawbacks that should be well handled.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-03 | vijaymehta31 | 80 | view |
| 2019-01-10 | ddk0014 | 77 | view |
| 2018-10-04 | Hari Sharma | 77 | view |
| 2018-06-19 | hoandang | 85 | view |
| 2018-06-12 | Kushi | 77 | view |
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 72
- Medical technology can increase the humans' life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse? 77
- It is argued that getting married before finishing school or getting a job is not a good choice. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- Some people believe that people who read books can develop more imagination and language skills than those who prefer to watch TV. Do you agree or disagree? 77
- Team sports are generally promoted as a great way to keep fit and build character. However, sporting events such as soccer matches are often accompanied by violence between rival supporters and other forms of antisocial behavior. If sporting events can le 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... impact of this trend on our environment in recent years. It can be agreed that t...
^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'new research'.
Suggestion: new research
... environment. For example, according to a new research from Harvard University, the environmen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29056603774 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97411641644 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588679245283 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1512418179 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.454545455 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231661734357 0.242375264174 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0978175271944 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115480239713 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144648639949 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058802247735 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.