Whether designing of buildings will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of the building structures and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of architectural designs is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that the modern building can be a plus, I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the individual's life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the lifestyle, as well as the city life, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experience which discovered the monumental architecture. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both the environmental design and human settlement apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, the working condition might increase the consequences of professional life. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the classical architecture could relate to this reality that the demerits of the working habits pertain to the working hours. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the building materials is correlated negatively with the luxury buildings. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the workaholic.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the impact of building design in the work-life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of skyscraper buildings prove the significance of the modern society, but also pinpoint the social work implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | jeeva | 77 | view |
- With the development of technology and science, some people believe that there is no great value of artists such as musicians and painters. What are the things artists can do but the scientist cannot? Why should we encourage the art area? 85
- Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 88
- people emphasizing government to build an advanced transport system rather new road for vehicles that are overcrowding the cities,do you agree or disagree. 85
- When computers first appeared on the scene, it was thought they would make us more productive in providing goods and services, smarter and possibly happier. Skeptics claim that the opposite is true as computers have proved disappointing in terms of produc 11
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while other prefer to play individual sport. Discuss the advantages of each. Then indicate which you prefer and why? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...s essay. From a social standpoint, the individuals life can provide the society with some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57462686567 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26586979944 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630597014925 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7333463339 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.5 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260819640843 0.242375264174 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759122898224 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500768327536 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140518212823 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513018997054 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.68 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.