Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don’t need. Give your opinion about this practice?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that companies use advertisement strategies to influence customers to buy unnecessary things. Critics, however, claim that advertisement campaigns are quiet beneficial for people to choose from variety of things. In my opinion, former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the features of this essay before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that companies use advertisements strategies to sale some products which are not essential for people. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact in this contemporary world, most of the national and multinational companies have set the trend to advertise their products by various means on mass communication. As a prime example, you tube bloggers are used for this purpose to sponsor the videos. Therefore, this trend influence the subscribers to buy that particular product.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that some advertisements strategies are based on hiring some famous celebrities to show case some product by their personal names. Hence, their followers are greatly influenced by these campaigns.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that advertisements not only forced people to buy unwanted products but also the way to influence people to spend extra amount of money on these things. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
- Should library use digital gadgets to provide information on different topics? Pros & Cons 80
- In town and cities, the large shopping mall should replace the small local shop. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples. 11
- More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement? 88
- Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 401, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the features of this essay before deducing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 115, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrities'.
Suggestion: celebrities
...nts strategies are based on hiring some famous celebrities to show case some product by their pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, so, therefore, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1323.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58227848101 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03929296292 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611814345992 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.585559751 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.25 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.91666666667 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231455669931 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822518623844 0.0925447433944 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473231419015 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134523990142 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0499106387823 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.