younger empolyees' skills.
Although topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on younger employees’ skills, knowledge and motivation can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the numerous argument that exits on either side, younger employees often have more competencies and inspiration than the old employees.
First and foremost, there are numerous reasons in favour of my stance. To commence with, the younger generations always have more interpersonal skills and cognitive skills. Moreover, it is crucial to consider that when junior employees use the breakthrough technologies and social media platform, their skills could be enhanced. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that governments should launch awareness campaigns to shed more light on young employees skills privileges.
Secondly, another pivotal aspect of the argument is that young people have more power to increase their earning capacity. Additionally, as soon as they have a long journey to build their own life, junior employees may be more willing to develop their skills. Consequently, it exemplifies that Non-Governmental Organizations should conduct extra-curricular activities to raise employees’ knowledge.
In conclusion, after I manifested the above ideas, it could be observed that there is equally potential evidence to support the above notions, and hence my opinion is that younger generations have more skills than the senior one.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-19 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2020-08-27 | sattar_iust | 85 | view |
| 2020-02-28 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-02-08 | Rohit@96 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Arshdeepbatth | 85 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, hence, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95833333333 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39835943939 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 383.4 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8439277438 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.7 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116592185011 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488446547513 0.0925447433944 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606804026533 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747347611587 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0379867514403 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.87 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.