Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness.
I wholeheartedly agree with this claim, that only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness.
Although both happiness and sadness are both relative and subjective terms, they both lie on two extreme, opposing ends of the scale, with contentedness being in the middle.
Now, one cannot possibly quantify how happy or sad they are, yet we can contrast it with an opposing emotion. In this case, sadness is the extreme opposite of happiness, and vice versa.
Similarly, one cannot define darkness as such. We cannot define it as the presence of something but rather, as the absence of light.
Likewise, happiness can be stated as the absence of sadness, of a morbid situation where nothing goes your way.
Thus, if one does not know what true sadness is, they cannot possibly know what true happiness is, either.
Also take note, the word “true” in preceding happiness. Sure, one person who has been content their entire life can experience some for of happiness. Suppose content is a zero on the scale, then happiness is to the right of zero. If one was not aware of negative numbers, than the range would be only zero to happiness. However, with sadness to the left of zero, we now have “negative” numbers. Thus, the entire range of emotions can go from sadness to happiness. In this sense, the range has doubled and one can know “true” happiness.
Just as happiness needs sadness, light needs darkness, pleasure needs pain, good needs evil. It even takes noise to appreciate silence. If we live our entire lives with only noise, we may accept it as a way of life. However, if someone is exposed to the stark contrast of silence, he can finally appreciate what they have been missing out their entire lives. Only than will we not be satisfied with just being content, we will strive to achieve the better of the two extremes, we will endeavour with all our willpower to attain true happiness only when we know what sadness really is. Without contrast, one cannot possibly appreciate something to it’s fullest. And without appreciation, there is no value.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-23 | Sushma97 | 93 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | madhuvankadari | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | ritvii | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | rohitsupadhyay | 50 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | SOUMEDHIK | 50 | view |
- "Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time." 50
- "People work more productively in teams than individually. Teamwork requires cooperation, which motivates people much more than individual competition does." 66
- Laws should not be rigid or fixed. Instead, they should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places. 50
- Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness. 33
- Only once one has known real sadness can one feel true happiness. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...know what true happiness is, either. Also take note, the word 'true' in...
^^^^
Line 10, column 283, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... one was not aware of negative numbers, than the range would be only zero to happine...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, likewise, may, really, similarly, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.3162921348 35% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92737430168 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71534242509 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522346368715 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.0251887955 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.1818181818 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2727272727 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.68181818182 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370751256512 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111543950981 0.0831039109588 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156129574923 0.0758088955206 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200544498395 0.150359130593 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.220972683953 0.0667264976115 331% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.38706741573 89% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 100.480337079 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.