Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down. Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals. Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion.
It is true that whether zoos are unethical or ethical for preserving wildlife is a subject of debate. While reasons can be given to justify the latter, the former is much more preferable.
On the one hand, zoo advocates would argue that zoos can be used for rehabilitating wildlife and endangered species. The first prominent justification is that zoos are regarded as a safe place for wild animals as they are brought into a safe environment which protects them from poachers as well as habitat loss. Besides, from an educational standpoint, zoos are also ideal places for bringing people and animals together by educating the public to protect animals. Children, in particular, are more likely to appreciate animals when they have the opportunity of approaching wild animals. By watching animal directly, children might have a more memorable experience rather than watching them on television.
On the other hand, animal right activists would claim that animal rights should be respected. Firstly, people do not have a moral right to breed, capture and confine any non-human creatures due to the fact that being an animal does not mean it has fewer rights than a human. Secondly, being kept in pens or cages might cause animals to suffer from stress, boredom, and confinement. For instance, research has shown that elephants in captivity do not outlive the natural ones. Last but not least, baby animals are put at risk of being sold to abusive circuses or even for slaughter when zoos face the overpopulation, and this also leads to a decrease in genetic diversity in the remaining individuals.
In conclusion, for the reasons mentioned above, although zoos are useful for conservation purposes to some extent, it seems to me that zoos should be shut down to ensure animal welfare.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | nguyenduchuy2705 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-21 | Ngoc Khanh Ong | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-18 | tran ngoc lam | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | AnCourses | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-22 | linh.king | 73 | view |
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 73
- In many countries today, people in cities either live alone or in small family units, rather than in large, extended family groups. Is this a positive or negative trend? 78
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal. 73
- Popular hobbies and interests change over time and are more a reflection of trends and fashions than an indication of what individuals really want to do in their spare time. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- The graphs below shows the percentage of boys and girls aged 5 14 who participated in organized cultural activities and sports in 2003 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1508.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11186440678 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75527959417 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593220338983 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0270223638 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224728529942 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0824841217332 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0611938613774 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148446566936 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407938085486 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.