Some people argue that we should do research into our family history. Others agree with the view that we should focus on the present and future generations. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is believed that we should launch investigations on our family history. The opposite point of view think that we should concentrate on the present and future generations. While it is clear that knowing the previous generations is very important, I believe that we should also research the following ones.
On the one hand, it is clear that the information which is related to our ancestors has not only cultural benefits but also medical. From the perspective of culture, researches associated with pedigrees provide progeny with a link to their root. If our children know that where their family originated and what precious traditions they need to be preserved, they will easily shape consciousness about protecting their parentage’s tangible traditional heritages. In terms of medical, the discoveries related to our ancestors help doctors to reveal a huge amount of medical information in searching for a cure. There are more and more parents who spent money on launching full-scale genealogical investigations to screen for hereditary diseases, which their children possibly are infected.
On the other hand, I think that it is beneficial if we can focus on the present and anticipate the future states. Firstly, people who live in the contemporary generation can set sensible moral examples to youngsters. Although it is clear that teachers can deliver their lectures about historical famous celebrity to children in schools, it is really hard for kids to imagine who they are and how they live. Meanwhile, they easily imitate patterns of behaviour to shape their personalities from surrounding people, especially parents, who live in the present. Secondly, we should look forward to the future to forecast advantages and disadvantages which we have to cope with. Our present globe has many instabilities associated with environment such as global warming and habitat destruction, and therefore, understanding and forecasting possible problems helps us to early find out effective solutions.
In conclusion, while I agree that we should conduct more research to explore our ancestry, this is by no mean that we should ignore the present and future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-27 | tieuquynh | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-26 | tieuquynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | annenguyen0203 | 56 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | Anne020304 | 78 | view |
| 2021-11-17 | Elenochka315 | 89 | view |
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008
- At schools students should only be taught academic knowledge to pass the exams and skills such as cookery dressmaking and woodwork should be learned from family and friends To what exteny do you agree or disagree 89
- The graph below shows the amount of electricity produced from different energy sources to supply the city of New York between 1980 and 2000 78
- The charts show the percentage of male and female students choosing science subjects in one university in 1992 and 2012 and the three most popular science subjects which they studied 59
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 298, Rule ID: FAMOUS_CELEBRITY[1]
Message: Use simply 'celebrity'.
Suggestion: celebrity
...deliver their lectures about historical famous celebrity to children in schools, it is really ha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e should ignore the present and future.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, look, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 7.30460921844 246% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 46.0 24.0651302605 191% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38823529412 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06481314027 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573529411765 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.109163759 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.133333333 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29907635698 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112053804676 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112287262786 0.0667982634062 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217368304155 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11860536918 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.