Some people think that instead of preventing climate change, we need to find a way to live with it. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In recent decades, climate change has aroused considerable public debate about its consequences. Facing this issue, many people argue that we should live with it rather than fighting against it. Although the idea of coexistence between human and global warming appears plausible, I advocate the opposite view.
The idea of living with climate change can seek supports some arguments below. First, since climate change is a part of natural process, many believe it is impossible to resist the laws of nature. A good example to illustrate that view is Japan, where people annually cope with many natural hazards such as earthquakes or tsunamis. After all, all the effort to fight against these natural forces seem in vain, which implies that human are only tiny species in the fight against Mother Nature. Second, by harnessing the advancements of technology, many supporters believe that it is straightforward to live with this phenomenon. In fact, thanks to geo-technology, although unable to combat, we human ca predict and minimize the most detrimental of severe storms, saving millions of lives.
However, there is a whole host of reasons why we should fight against climate change instead of co-living. First, accepting and living with it equals to the degradation of human health. Since the alarming rate of carbon and other chemical toxics in the air leads to the development of many diseases such as skin and respiratory illness, human health and well-being will be adversely affected. Not to mention, this climate crisis also triggers ice-melting, leading to sea encroachment. In fact, in many coastal areas such as Vietnam and The Philippines, this phenomenon runs the risk of losing living space and shelter for daily and economic activities, causing many trials and tribulations for human.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that human should combat and find solutions for the climate change’s problems instead of living together with it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Dheeraj0809 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | Shruti Patel | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | Mimibae 985 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-22 | phuongthuy1212 | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-11 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The technology development has affected social relationships from person to person Do the negative aspects of this trend outweigh the positive aspects 50
- A few major languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development? 84
- It is often thought that the increase in juvenile crime can be attributed to violence in the media. What do you think is the reason for a growth in the rate of juvenile crime? What solutions can you offer to deal with this situation? 84
- It is said that the fast pace of our everyday life as a direct result of the rapid development of telecommunications technology and travel industry has negative effects on individuals nations and globe To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Sending criminals to prison is not the best method of dealing with them. Education and job training are better ways to help them. Do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, second, so, well, after all, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1660.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33762057878 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78218488311 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594855305466 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.0966340876 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.06120827912 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177833197881 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0683945218671 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606624099842 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131873589349 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0398315578476 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.