People who do not use social media networks will always fall behind in career development opportunities.
To what extent do you feel that this is an accurate and important prediction?
Social networking sites have been a fertile land with lots of potential for career growth. Some people have even remarked that without utilizing these networks, it is inevitable that one will miss out on significant opportunities to further one's career. From my standpoint, I largely disagree with this view.
On one hand, social sites have proved to be a transformational element in the advancement of some people’s success. The roots of this tend to be in the far-reaching exposure that is provided by these platforms, which regularly attract millions of users. Being able to tap into such a digital market, one can promote their products or services. Indeed, this is true for those whose jobs are strongly tied to online viewers, such as streamers, Youtubers or social media influencers. For this reason, their strong presence on the Internet is the precursor to the considerable success that follows.
However, the aforementioned cases only constitute a marginal proportion of all jobs. Also, while social media initiate a short burst of success, a career on these sites, at its core, can only be sustained in the same way as with other offline occupations, which is with the generation of values. This is exemplified by the fact that without exception, successful people on social media choose to venture into different areas, diversifying ways to provide new contents to their viewers. Furthermore, for certain professions, there are prerequisite requirements that must be met before familiarity with social networks is considered. Practicing medicines, teaching or working as a technician, for example, all demand recognized qualifications and substantive training. Lastly, people must also be wary of the downsides of social media, as companies are willing to dispense with the service of employees who leak sensitive photos or post controversial topics on their accounts.
In brief, while I acknowledge that social media platforms have catapulted many people to new heights in their careers, it is in my conviction that not only these cases are rare but social media only play a supplementary role. For most careers to ascend, there are more important elements, ranging from official qualification to real values creation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-08 | mylinh3001 | 84 | view |
| 2021-05-31 | Quân Lê 2020 | 95 | view |
| 2021-04-20 | Quân Lê 2020 | 89 | view |
| 2021-01-03 | pyg165@yahoo.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | aghaei.arsalan | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- The plans below show the changes at a small theater in 2010 and 2012 67
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Nowadays more tasks at home and work are being performed by robots Is this a negative or positive development 89
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 976, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...controversial topics on their accounts. In brief, while I acknowledge that socia...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, lastly, so, while, for example, in brief, such as, in the same way
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 353.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35410764873 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03745606782 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603399433428 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9100312435 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.125 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0625 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4375 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172295669466 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0554609762617 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361057269769 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111580845196 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020562852511 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.