Some people think the newly-built houses should be as same as the old house style in local areas. Others argue that local authorities should allow people to build houses in their own styles. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some people believe that modern-built houses should be of the same style as other constructions in the area. Others, however, think that individuals should freely build houses to their own choice. Although both views possess a degree of accuracy, I support the notion that local settings become key factors in this debate.
On the one hand, housing buildings must be similar to those of the region in order to preserve the physical structures and cultural values. In fact, there are places that are historic and hold significant architectural importance. Therefore, houses should be constructed in an identical fashion to not disrupt the general landscapes, or else the whole area’s structure would shift permanently. Consequently, it is optimal for certain places to restrict the alteration in housing style.
On the other hand, some individuals want to have the right to make their choice in this matter. Specifically, development in the technological aspect has enabled people to integrate sophisticated features and apply colossal amenities in their houses. As a result, people can utilize cutting-edge technology to automate their living space and eliminate the arduous burdens of household chores, enormously improving their living quality. For instance, it is prevalent for people to incorporate virtual assistance with the furniture to help them manage trivial details such as turning on the lamp. Consequently, adopting a new housing fashion is greatly beneficial.
To conclude, despite controversial schools of thought on determining the ultimate style that houses should follow, I endorse the hypothesis that it should rely on the locations’ conditions. While houses should be of the same style in historically and architecturally crucial places, people in other places should be able to freely construct their homes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-10 | Leon_nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-25 | @hoangnguyen | 78 | view |
| 2021-06-18 | nguyenvosonghao | 95 | view |
| 2021-06-17 | anhsunrise | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-12 | oanhnth | 73 | view |
- More and more people in the city live in home with small spaces or no outdoor areas Is this a positive or negative development 56
- Some people think that climate change could have a negative effect on business Other people think that climate change could create more business opportunities Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- People believe that children commit crimes should be punished Others think parents should be punished instead Discuss both view and give your opinion 67
- Governments in major cities around the world spend enormous expenditure for restoration of old buildings This money should be used for providing new housing and road development Do you agree or disagree 78
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 271, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an identical fashion" with adverb for "identical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...Therefore, houses should be constructed in an identical fashion to not disrupt the general landscapes, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, however, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in fact, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1556.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55714285714 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04703770497 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7250907431 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.142857143 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.464451337977 0.244688304435 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146820603922 0.084324248473 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124345327728 0.0667982634062 186% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.290020029156 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.133535995853 0.056905535591 235% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.