Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes?
International tourism is widely believed to be a factor negatively affecting a country due to a number of reasons. However, tourism still has a pivotal role to play in people’s life, thus solutions are needed to be found out in order to avoid unwanted implications. This following essay is going to go over both of these two issues.
In terms of the roots for individuals’ discontentment with international tourism, it can be firstly put down to environmental pollution. Undoubtedly, when a large number of visitors flock to an area for their holiday, they might then leave such a great amount of litter and trash in that place, which can adversely contaminate the surroundings there. As a consequence, the landscapes of a country may have to bear a huge pressure of being spoiled. Moreover, foreigners coming to a nation can also bring with them their own cultures and ways of living, which might not be always appropriate to the territory they are visiting. For example, a few months ago, a foreign woman coming to Vietnam wore a sexual clothes when entering a pagoda. This is far beyond Vietnamese culture’s perspectives and therefore has sparked anger in most native people.
In order to prevent those setbacks, various solutions should be carried out. To begin with, governments should enforce more stringent regulations on the tourism industry, ensuring that everyone takes responsibility for their actions. Otherwise, mass tourism may continue to behave out of order, thereby badly affecting the image of a country itself. In addition, every holiday-makers should spare some time to explore other nations’ traditions, so that not only can they gain a better understanding of the lifestyle there but also avoid embarrassing themselves.
To conclude, it seems to me that international tourism can be changed positively once all those concerns above are addressed by prompt actions.
- The consumption of the world s resources is increasing at a dangerous rate What are the causes and solutions 56
- Many people go to university for academic study More people should be encouraged to do vocational training because there is a lack of qualified workers such as electricians and plumbers To what extent do you agree or disagree 87
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some believe that it is good for a country s culture to import films and TV programmes while others think it is better for a country to have their own films and TV programmes Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ironmental pollution. Undoubtedly, when a large number of visitors flock to an area for their hol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean '(clothes)'?
Suggestion: (clothes)
...n woman coming to Vietnam wore a sexual clothes when entering a pagoda. This is far bey...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24918032787 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09065048133 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645901639344 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6133287996 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21118587218 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671768143302 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059187819175 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122936390438 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327589045684 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ironmental pollution. Undoubtedly, when a large number of visitors flock to an area for their hol...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 706, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean '(clothes)'?
Suggestion: (clothes)
...n woman coming to Vietnam wore a sexual clothes when entering a pagoda. This is far bey...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, thus, for example, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24918032787 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09065048133 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.645901639344 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6133287996 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.357142857 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 7.06120827912 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21118587218 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671768143302 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059187819175 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122936390438 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327589045684 0.056905535591 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.