Task 2: Many people believe that it is easier to have a healthy lifestyle in the countryside. Others believe that there are health benefits of living in the cities. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There is a widespread belief that living in the countryside is healthier than in the cities. Meanwhile, many people also argue that city life can provide dwellers with several health benefits. As far as I am concerned, I firmly believe that living in the cities is much more advantageous.
On the one hand, many residents believe that rural areas are no longer healthy places, whereas the cities can provide them with a much better healthcare system. Indeed, the massive development of agro-industries has led to the gradual disappearance of traditional ways of life in the countryside. As a result, even when living in rural areas, it is impossible for the inhabitants to live close to nature, in which conventional harvesting or celebration of spring has also fallen by the wayside. Meanwhile, thanks to the appropriate speculation of housing stocks and healthcare infrastructures, people living in the cities can be provided with good public health services, including hospitals, dentists, or medical practitioners. Furthermore, it is also easy for them to get access to numerous amenities such as sport centers or gyms to take up regular exercise.
On the other hand, I concur with the opinion that the countryside still endows many health benefits, including fresh air and tranquility. Firstly, due to the mass exodus of economic migrants into the cities, many people on a tight budget have to endure squalid housing conditions. Social bonds are also impossible to achieve in these concrete jungles, which potentially causes several mental problems for residents, especially autism. Thus, finding accommodation in rural areas can be considered a suitable way to escape from the hectic pace of life as well as to stimulate the feeling of community, which is an indispensable aspect of a healthy lifestyle. Secondly, in terms of air quality, the flooding of heavy transportation to the urban areas also promotes the excessive release of toxic fumes containing several harmful chemicals such as carbon dioxide, which can lead to many respiratory diseases for the residents. In contrast, the countryside still possesses convenient atmosphere due to the absence of traffic-derived contaminants.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the living conditions in the cities are incompatible with a healthy lifestyle, while physical and mental well-being can be achieved in rural areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-08 | quynhanhbuiviet | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | hi.nguyn91 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-11 | Harley Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | samandarkumar | 56 | view |
| 2022-01-24 | dqnghuy | 61 | view |
- Task 2 An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment Why is this the case and what solutions are possible 84
- Task 2 In some countries advertisers increase the amount of advertising which tries to persuade children to buy snacks toys and other goods Parents object to such pressure on children But some advertisers claim that there is useful information in these ad 78
- Task 1 The chart shows the percentage of males and females who were overweight in Australia from 1980 to 2010
- There are several factors that motivate people to stay in the workforce and money is the most important factor To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Task 2 Today some families are not eating meals together on a daily basis Why Is this a positive or negative trend 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 187, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...l-being can be achieved in rural areas.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, still, thus, well, whereas, while, as to, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result, as well as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2013.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 375.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.368 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1440667225 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 639.9 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.7827617296 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.2 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.9333333333 7.06120827912 183% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207075960981 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0707384985825 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550818465566 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142353769546 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0436520093773 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.