schools should focus more on teaching students how to succeed in the world of work and less on how to succeed academically. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, many people argue that teachers should teach students about academics at school. Others say soft skills are more significant and should be included in the syllabus. Personally, I agree with both and will discuss my views below.
There are two main reasons I support these ideas. One reason is that soft skills are essential in real life. Not only teenagers but also adults are needed and use it to apply to existence. For instance, employers often look for candidates with strong communication, teamwork, problem-solving and leadership skills. By teaching soft skills schools can better prepare students for the workforce. Additionally, soft skills are crucial to the development of a new relationship. Empathy, active listening and conflict resolution can help students build stronger relationships with their peers, family and friends. It is necessary in the school or work place, which can assist people to connect well with each other and achieve their goals.
Apart from the practical benefits expressed above, I believe schools should focus on teaching academic subjects. They provide students with knowledge and skills necessary to succeed in a high school setting. Academic subjects such as Maths, Science, Arts and Social Studies provide a foundation of knowledge essential for students to know the world around them. They also help students develop critical thinking and problem solving skills. Furthermore, academic subjects are often required for admission to colleges and universities. They are often necessary for success in many careers and those are the points to evaluate and select candidates to see if they pass or fail.
In conclusion, it seems evident that both academic subjects and social skills have their own unique advantages. People have to consider to succeed in their life.
- The graph below shows the hours of teaching per year done by each teacher in four different countries in 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas As a result people eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- In the future it is expected that there will be a higher proportion of older people in some countries Is this positive or negative development 56
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 61
- Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams like football while other people think that taking part in individual sports like tennis or swimming is better Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[3]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'consider succeeding'.
Suggestion: consider succeeding
...r own unique advantages. People have to consider to succeed in their life.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, look, so, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1534.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4014084507 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73277549251 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602112676056 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.1054471838 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7368421053 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9473684211 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184112762508 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0550482146453 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0558599530743 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113644182161 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494166004378 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.45 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.