Many of today's most urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that global collaboration is the only panacea to deal with numerous most pressing issues that are prevalent in this contemporary scenario. Although nations are accountable to resolve severe economical and environmental problems, namely poverty and climatic change, on their own, obtaining international assistance could address these issues in a very effective way.
To begin with, several financial troubles such as poverty, starvation, and unemployment, which are prevalent among poverty-stricken nations, can easily be addressed by global coordination. Even though some experts might assert that these nations ought to tackle their own problems by themselves, I would argue that these countries do not possess any enormous wealth that is essential to overcome such difficulties. To explain it, only if affluent nations provide financial aid, adequate food, and lucrative job opportunities to impoverished countries, will the latter easily get rid of their abject poverty, famines, and the scarcity of jobs. In this way, not only would individuals from destitute nations acquire better living standards, but such assistance will probably nurture stronger relationships and improved understanding among both countries. The financial assistance from America to India for distinct social issues is quintessential, resulting in strong political as well as trading relationships between them.
Moving further, despite the aforementioned economic issues, international collaboration is needed to address ecological problems also. While I concede that the intensive usage of automobiles and innumerable industries makes developed nations responsible for eliminating environment-related issues, I consider that the valuable assistance from undeveloped countries is also extremely beneficial. In other words, in spite of the weak economy, some nations possess abundant resources that are required to alleviate global warming and pollution levels. By using these resources and machinery, several environmental troubles can easily be eliminated. To illustrate, owing to the widespread usage of charcoal purifiers, an eco- friendly product that is manufactured in Africa, carbon emissions, and noxious gases from Canadian vehicles has been alleviated, culminating into negligible global warming and changes in climate.
In conclusion, despite the fact that countries are responsible to resolve their own urgent issues, these troubles can easily be tackled with international collaboration. Therefore, I completely agree that Global support is the only way to solve the most burning issues of this present scenario.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-13 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-14 | sayam jutt | 89 | view |
| 2020-03-07 | Phạm Văn Hậu | 57 | view |
| 2019-09-10 | Lincoln | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-12 | ymyhcd | 80 | view |
- Many small local shops are closing as they are unable to compete with large supermarkets in the area How does this effect local communities How could this solution be improved 61
- In some countries school remain open for more hours so that children can be looked after because their parents are working Does the advantage outweigh the disadvantages of this 77
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Old people today struggle with the use of modern technologies such as smartphones and computers What is the cause of this What are some possible solutions 82
- Many of today s most urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 130, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...s needed to address ecological problems also. While I concede that the intensive usa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in other words, in spite of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2270.0 1615.20841683 141% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08579088472 5.12529762239 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24593253601 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600536193029 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 715.5 506.74238477 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.3050389004 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.142857143 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127548429098 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0469694103846 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445131478663 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927254569419 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623994079084 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.6 13.0946893788 157% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 19.71 50.2224549098 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.34 12.4159519038 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 78.4519038076 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.