in a number of countries some people think it is necessary to spend large sum of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
discus both these views and give your opinion.
Some people are believed to have been expensed budget on constructing new public transport system, while others hold the view that previous railways should be repaired for using again. I personally believed that with advancing in technology especially in terms of transport, there is an essential need to change and set up new commuting facilities. In this essay I will shed some light from both side and extend my view before arriving at conclusion.
Although establishing new transport facilities need to spend a great deal of money, most of People insist on update this system based on epoch making invention. New technology have always bring numerous benefits for human being in multifold dimension. For example, not only is transport facilities more convenient, but also it is cheaper and faster than old models. Moreover, despite rampant pollution which were appeared by old facilities, new transport vehicles are more eco-friendly and almost have not posed devastating effect on environment. For instance, nowadays electronic train which have used solar energy for generating electricity are more prevalent. Most of people have insisted on setting up new railway system.
In another hand some people are said that government should not dedicate a huge amount of money for building new railway network. If government have surplus money, this money could spend on other fields, such as new hospital and university. When with repairing old railways and transport network, they become useable, devoting money for constructing new system is wasting resources. As a result, some people are accepted to use previous commuting system.
In conclusion, considering above explanation, both groups have rational justification and opinion to some extent. I personally think with progressing in technology it is necessary to become update in every aspect of life. Improving railways qualification can upgrade our daily life. It is recommended that government update and improve commuting facilities in every region where have direct impact on human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-18 | anoj adhikari | 67 | view |
| 2020-08-24 | Anabahari | 84 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | minhtrieutr | 56 | view |
| 2019-03-12 | minhtrieutr | 73 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problem To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- COUNTRIES ARE BECOMING MORE AND MORE SIMILAR BEXAUSE PEOPLE ARE ABLE TO BYE THE SAME PRODUCY ANY WHERE IN THE WORLD.DO YOU THINK IT IS POSITIVE OR NEGATIVE DEVELOPMENT? 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal Some people however think that other types of progress are equally important for country Discuss both these views and give your opinion 78
- Some people believe that teenagers should concentrate on all schools subject but others believe that they are good at or that they find the most interest Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Do you think human behavior is based on nature or nurture? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 189, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'brought'.
Suggestion: brought
...g invention. New technology have always bring numerous benefits for human being in mu...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 664, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the people') or simply say ''Most people''.
Suggestion: Most of the people; Most people
...erating electricity are more prevalent. Most of people have insisted on setting up new railway...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47634069401 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85865342633 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596214511041 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5879515782 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.117647059 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6470588235 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76470588235 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304845248146 0.244688304435 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0973013650591 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661994143578 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186082846509 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0734608091807 0.056905535591 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.