Whether the design of the building will have a positive or negative impact on people's life and work?
Recently, the phenomenon of building design and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of professional design is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both thoroughly constructive and positive by a substantial number of individual. I am inclined to believe that the effectiveness of architecture can be a plus, and this essay will examine this idea before concluding.
From the architecture standpoint, comfortable environment can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that building construction and astonishing workplace are extremely bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a college student, I participated in an academic survey which results in the important roles of hospital design. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both environmentally friendly building and preserving the people’s mode apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, creativity in design might increase the consequences of building’s cost. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of designing cost-effective accommodation could have related to this reality that building infrastructure should be well-made. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious institute about the quality of the workplace and its relation with the office design. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notions of modern architectural monuments and its positive impacts on people’s healthy lifestyle.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents argue about the different aspects of modern designing, I profoundly tend to believe that the benefit of impressive designs outweighs its drawbacks. Not to mention that with regards to the advancements of technology, modern buildings can play a significant role in a professional way of living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | yasamin.gharib62 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-10 | Jaskaransingh11 | 77 | view |
| 2019-10-09 | Daniel Torres | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | jeeva | 77 | view |
- Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree? 77
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 85
- Many companies involve employees in decision-making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 88
- Some people think that young people can learn useful skills by playing electronic and computer games. others argue that people who play electronic and computer games are wasting their time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. What extent do you agree or disagree? 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 326, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a professional way" with adverb for "professional"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...n buildings can play a significant role in a professional way of living.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1617.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 276.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85869565217 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49472815377 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623188405797 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 504.9 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6132400808 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.75 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.91666666667 7.25397266985 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202650819704 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0724271720941 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0422308259495 0.071462118173 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116168038782 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529217068656 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 12.6369458128 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.