It is important for all towns and cities to have large public spaces such as squares
and parks. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people claim that all towns and cities need to have large public areas such as squares and parks. While these places bring to cities a range of benefits, I personally believe that it is unnecessary for all cities to build them.
To begin with, there are several reasons why parks or squares are important for cities. Firstly, these places are equipped with many sport facilities, which allows citizens to relax and do physical activities. As a result, this would improve public health.. If there are no parks and squares, people would rarely enjoy fresh air in big cities such as Ho Chi Minh city. Secondly, these destinations having many trees would help reduce the amount of carbon
dioxide and gas emissions in the air. This could mitigate air pollution and climate change.
However, I also argue that all cities do not have to build parks or squares. First, since these places are often required to construct and maintain, the government spends a large amount of money on them. Instead of building parks, the government could invest budget in key sectors such as health care and education. Furthermore, parks and squares need to be built in large areas, which lead to a lack of land to build other essential constructions such as hopital, schools and skyscrapers. If parks are built, cities have more space to construct others.
In conclusion, although public places have many advantages, it would be wasted resources to build them in all cities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-07 | anhthunee | 61 | view |
| 2022-01-07 | anhthunee | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-05 | eyraen | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-03 | Nguyễn Thị Thanh Thảo | 67 | view |
| 2021-08-21 | caigicungduoc | 78 | view |
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 78
- The graph shows the information about the number of marriages in the UK from 1951 to 2001
- In the developed world average life expectancy is increasing What problems will this cause for individuals and society Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impacts of ageing populations 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 67
- Nowadays consumer goods are cheaper to buy Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... have large public areas such as squares and parks. While these places bring to c...
^^
Line 3, column 256, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...result, this would improve public health.. If there are no parks and squares, peo...
^^
Line 3, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t, this would improve public health.. If there are no parks and squares, people w...
^^
Line 3, column 456, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s would help reduce the amount of carbon dioxide and gas emissions in the air. Th...
^^^
Line 6, column 448, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d to build other essential constructions such as hopital, schools and skyscrapers...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1222.0 1615.20841683 76% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9674796748 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47397719408 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581300813008 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 365.4 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3797720734 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2857142857 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5714285714 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362899355988 0.244688304435 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121840886356 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100817970097 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176684232973 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117310294915 0.056905535591 206% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.