In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
It is argued that there are a great deal of issues occurring on our planet that is increasingly harsh to settle. While I agree that it is vital to tackle this problem, I firmly believe that the cost of research on new planets for future residence should be more dispending.
There are two primary reasons why life on the Earth is becoming more and more unsustainable. At first, one of main factors is uncontrolled consumption of natural resources, especially non-renewal resources. As a result, the exceed exploitation leads to a significant scarcity of mineral that is essential for construction and manufacture. Unfortunately, those type of resources are not able to be restored by any methods. In addition, another reason is a huge amount of disposal waste discharged into rivers and atmosphere that directly impact to environment and ecosystem. This gives rise to several serious problems about green house, global warming and climate change that are threatening our planet day by day.
However, spending more finance on finding another planet that might be a new house for humanity is truly unrealistic and extensive lavishness. Firstly, studies have shown that there are no any planets that is similar to the Earth to sustain human life in our solar system. Moreover, recent explorations in the vicinity of other solar systems obtains clues about any planets without presence of living organisms. Secondly, it is clear that expenditure for research on a new planet to settle would be more expensive than other alternative methods. For excample, in spite of funding on finding a new promised land projects, gorvenments should focus on other projects that give realistic solutions to resolve two mainly reason for more difficult living on the Earth such as generating materials that can alter steel on construction and munufacture how finding how to tacke the harmful emission before discharging them into our habitats.
In conclusion, although the environment is progressively severe to live and finding another planet is one of ways to address it, but there are numberous methods that are not only more reasonable and economical, but also not have many challenges to approach and fulfill them.
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize he information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Some people think that people who choose a job early and keep doing it are more likely to have a satisfying career life than those who frequently change jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people believe that living in big cities is becoming more difficult Others believe that it is getting easier Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- The consumption of the world s resources oil and water etc is increasing at a dangerous rate What are causes and solutions 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 37, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deals'?
Suggestion: deals
It is argued that there are a great deal of issues occurring on our planet that ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...lly non-renewal resources. As a result, the exceed exploitation leads to a significant sca...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 187, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...stly, studies have shown that there are no any planets that is similar to the Eart...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1854.0 1615.20841683 115% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22253521127 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91685482243 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574647887324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.9419672645 49.4020404114 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.428571429 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6428571429 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250632857262 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0807166173539 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0681112312492 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148109485949 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581204029408 0.056905535591 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.