Some people work for long hours and hard to achieve success and some give importance to free time for them. Give your opinion and discuss your views.
Recently, the relationship between hard work and success has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the positive and negative consequences of working for long hours and hard?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that giving importance to free time is more advantageous, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, scientific achievements are bound up inextricably with gaining a better job position, which indicates they lead to both being overwhelmed and exhausted. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in health issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of destructive impact is correlated positively with not only globalization but also economic crisis.
Within the realm of economy, without the slightest doubt, job satisfaction attribute to annual earning, in that it would come down to living in prosperity, profitable business, and higher income. A salient example of such attribution is an economic agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take alternative solutions for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of positive consequences of leisure activities.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely believe that there are some reasons to support the idea of working hard ensures guarantees success. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-02-02 | honorrr | 85 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 55 | view |
| 2021-01-29 | honorrr | 77 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | Alireza.r.m | 80 | view |
| 2020-02-29 | Alireza.r.m | 77 | view |
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the Western countries According to you what solutions can be proposed by the government and individuals 88
- Polygamy has led to massive divorce rate around the globe Give possible solutions for various situations to reduce the issues 55
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packed products or it is responsibility of producer to avoid extra packaging of products Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience 88
- With all the troubles in the world today money spent on space exploration is a complete waste The money could be better spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and give any relevant example or experience 80
- Environment pollution is too alarming to be managed by individuals Real change can be made at the government level What extent do you agree or disagree 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '“' seems to be missing
...nces of working for long hours and hard?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68438538206 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19131308398 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687707641196 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.7521884574 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1538461538 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191038704343 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.048257170211 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727924844422 0.071462118173 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113471509105 0.151781067708 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107581412064 0.0609392437508 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.02 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.