Q : Developing countries require help offered by international organizations to ensure healthy and sustainable development. Some people think that financial aid is important. Others believe that practical aid and advice is more important. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the question of how to support emerging countries has become the subject of heated debate. Some people assert that practical advice and aid for less-developed nations should take precedence over monetary support, while others argue otherwise. Personally, I believe that both arguments should be given equal weight. In the following essay, both views will be discussed before a conclusion is reached with my opinion.
On the one hand, people who claim that financial help benefits third world countries a great deal do so for several reasons. Proponents of this argument insist that an astronomical amount of money is required to construct a high quality of infrastructure, including railways and roads, that makes it possible for developing countries to have an opportunity to invigorate economic growth. In fact, poorer nations are not able to afford to build facilities without monetary help from governments across the globe. In addition, a multitude of citizens in Africa are suffering from global hunger as well as a lack of having access to basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced meals. If it were not for financial support from charitable organisations, they would have difficulty leading a better life.
On the other hand, others contend that more emphasis should be placed on practical aid and technical advice than monetary help. Those who support such a view assume that although it seems beneficial for developed countries to give financial aid in the short term, developed nations that have a myriad of invaluable skills and experiences derived from trial and error should teach these skills and experiences to third world countries considering that receiving practical skills enables them not only to achieve economic and political progress but also to become less dependent on other countries. Furthermore, a large number of developing nations often experience high levels of corruption that prevents citizens from having an improved standard of living. If they receive numerous pieces of advice from experts in global organisations, this phenomenon would be alleviated. In light of the above, some people hold the view that practical aid is needed in order to make poorer countries thrive.
In conclusion, it is undeniable that there are a variety of opinions about this topic. However, after considering this matter in a careful manner, it can be concluded that each side of the debate has its strengths, as discussed above.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-09 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-08 | idid382021 | 84 | view |
| 2022-08-07 | idid382021 | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | idid382002 | 89 | view |
- People think that old buildings should be knocked down and give way to modern buildings To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- QQ4 Some people think that social networking sites have a huge negative impact on both individuals and society To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Q3 Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems To what extent do you agree with this statement 89
- Q1 Over the last few decades there has been an increase in international tourism Some people think that tourism is beneficial for local communities and should be encouraged To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Q16 Research says more and more business training and business meeting are taking place online Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...r as well as a lack of having access to basic necessities, such as primary education and balanced...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 696, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
...s primary education and balanced meals. if it were not for financial support from ...
^^
Line 5, column 611, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ending on other countries. Furthermore, a large number of developing nations often experience hig...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, third, well, while, in addition, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1892.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 351.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39031339031 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83398606511 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584045584046 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 96.4155811356 49.4020404114 195% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.142857143 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0714285714 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254338612173 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817300925437 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686421006794 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173368201583 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0629849266146 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.