Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified? Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation?
Innumerable advances are being made in the field of science and medicine. But the animals are prime victims of the experiments of new products. Some group of people argue that using them for the experiments is doing injustice to them. Before commenting on my opinion, I would provide the reasons for this purpose and the alternatives, if there are any, in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, since the past 100 years, scientists drugs and cosmetics on animals like mice, rodents and monkeys. These animals have similarities with human beings, so the medicines are tested on them to ensure that it would not cause any side effects to people. For instance, if a drug is invented for a new disease, it is first examined on mice or apes. If there is no adverse effect on them, then the medicine will be out in the market. But if the drug affects their health, the scientists might have to prepare another one. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to folks do not justify the suffering caused, and scientists should use alternate methods.
On the flip side, reliable alternatives to animals experimentation are hardly available. Supporters think that a certain amount of discomfort on the part of mice or rats can be justified if mortal lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if any of their family members suffer from any non-tested drugs.
All in all, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I believe that it may be a necessary evil where new rugs and medicinal procedures are concerned. It seems to me that it would be wrong to ban experimenting on animals for vital pharma nautical research until equally effective proxies have been developed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-20 | ahdbak | 73 | view |
| 2022-05-13 | ngannguyen2408 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-09 | stereouniverse | 89 | view |
| 2020-08-20 | sillyhazel8989 | 89 | view |
| 2020-02-17 | Thang Tran | 84 | view |
- Living in a country where you have to speak foreign language can cause serious problems as well as practical problems 73
- Some people claim that it is acceptable to use animals in medical research for the benefit of human beings while other people argue that it is wrong Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Nuclear power is a necessary evil despite the potential human and environmental consequences as radioactive fallouts nuclear energy is a genuine alternative to non renewable energy sources like oil and coal Which are quickly running out In short the benef 95
- Do you believe that experimentation on animals for scientific purposes is justified Are there any alternatives to animal experimentation 89
- Nowadays young people spend too much of their free time in shopping malls Some people fear that this may have negative effects on young people and the society they live in To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...the medicine will be out in the market. but if the drug affects their health, the s...
^^^
Line 3, column 631, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures shou...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, for instance, kind of, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8785046729 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69237830234 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576323987539 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4243548928 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0625 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1875 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27454529474 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808055689166 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665289318584 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156482849563 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251190027849 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.0946893788 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.